RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 1 record.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 8577, "Signaling RSVP-TE Tunnels on a Shared MPLS Forwarding Plane", April 2019

Source of RFC: mpls (rtg)

Errata ID: 5743
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Date Reported: 2019-05-30
Held for Document Update by: Deborah Brungard
Date Held: 2019-05-30

Section 11.3 says:

   IANA manages the "Record Route Object Sub-object Flags" registry as
   part of the "Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-
   TE) Parameters" registry located at <http://www.iana.org/assignments/
   rsvp-te-parameters>.  Prior to this document, this registry did not
   include Label Sub-object Flags.  This document creates the addition
   of a new subregistry for Label Sub-object Flags as shown below.

      Flag  Name                    Reference

      0x1   Global Label            [RFC3209]
      0x02  TE Link Label           [RFC8577], Section 9.3
      0x04  Delegation Label        [RFC8577], Section 9.5

It should say:

   IANA manages the "Record Route Object Sub-object Flags" registry as
   part of the "Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-
   TE) Parameters" registry located at <http://www.iana.org/assignments/
   rsvp-te-parameters>.  Prior to this document, this registry did not
   include Label Sub-object Flags.  This document creates the addition
   of a new subregistry for Label Sub-object Flags as shown below.

      Flag  Name                    Reference

      0x1   Global Label            [RFC3209]
      0x02  TE Link Label           [RFC8577], Section 9.3
      0x04  Delegation Label        [RFC8577], Section 9.5
 
  All assignments in this sub-registry are to be performed via
  Standards Action.

Notes:

This errata is being reported as a response to the following email from IANA.

**
Authors/WG Chairs/ADs for RFC 8577,

During the publication process, the registration procedures were unintentionally removed from the document. Is this something that an errata should be submitted for?

In version 9 of the document, it says: All assignments in this sub-registry are to be performed via Standards Action.

In the published RFC this sentence does not appear to be there.

Please advise.

Thank you,

Michelle Cotton
Protocol Parameters Engagement Sr. Manager

Report New Errata