RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 5 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 7483, "JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)", March 2015

Source of RFC: weirds (app)

Errata ID: 4503
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Scott Hollenbeck
Date Reported: 2015-10-14
Verifier Name: Barry Leiba
Date Verified: 2016-01-21

Section 5.2 and 5.3 says:

In Section 5.2:

"ldhName" : "ns1.xn--fo-5ja.example",
"unicodeName" : "ns1.foo.example",

In Section 5.3:

"ldhName" : "xn--fo-5ja.example",
"unicodeName" : "foo.example",

"ldhName" : "xn--fo-cka.example",
"unicodeName" : "foo.example"

"ldhName" : "xn--fo-fka.example",
"unicodeName" : "foo.example"

"ldhName": "xn--fo-8ja.example",
"unicodeName" : "foo.example"

It should say:

In Section 5.2:

"ldhName" : "ns1.xn--fo-5ja.example",
"unicodeName" : "ns1.fóo.example",

In Section 5.3:

"ldhName" : "xn--fo-5ja.example",
"unicodeName" : "fóo.example",

"ldhName" : "xn--fo-cka.example",
"unicodeName" : "fõo.example"

"ldhName" : "xn--fo-fka.example",
"unicodeName" : "föo.example"

"ldhName" : "xn--fo-8ja.example",
"unicodeName" : "fôo.example"

Notes:

The unicodeName examples in RFC 7483 are invalid per RFC 5890. Here's an example from Section 5.2 on page 23:

"unicodeName" : "ns1.foo.example",

Section 3 of 7483 says this about Unicode names:

"Unicode names: Textual representations of DNS names where one or more of the labels are U-labels as described by [RFC5890]."

5890 says: "A "U-label" is an IDNA-valid string of Unicode characters, in Normalization Form C (NFC) and including at least one non-ASCII character, expressed in a standard Unicode Encoding Form (such as UTF-8)."

The examples in 7483 contain all ASCII characters. Syntactically valid examples are shown in the corrected text.

Status: Reported (4)

RFC 7483, "JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)", March 2015

Source of RFC: weirds (app)

Errata ID: 4980
Status: Reported
Type: Technical

Reported By: Scott Hollenbeck
Date Reported: 2017-03-24

Section 5.5 says:

country -- a string containing the name of the two-character
country code of the autnum

It should say:

country -- a string containing the two-character country
code of the autnum

Notes:

As described in Section 3, country codes should consistently be represented as two-character string values. Note that this differs from the "full name" format used in jCard representations of entity objects.

Errata ID: 5667
Status: Reported
Type: Technical

Reported By: Andrew Newton
Date Reported: 2019-03-22

Section 4.8 says:

identifier -- a public identifier of the type denoted by "type"

It should say:

identifier -- a string denoting a public identifier of the type 
              related to "type"

Notes:

While the example given in section 4.8 shows "identifier" being a string, the prose description does not clearly state it.

Errata ID: 4859
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Marcos Sanz
Date Reported: 2016-11-10

Section 5.3 says:

"network" :
     {
       "objectClassName" : "ip network",
       "handle" : "XXXX-RIR",
       "startAddress" : "192.0.2.0",
       "endAddress" : "192.0.2.255",
       "ipVersion" : "v6",

It should say:

"network" :
     {
       "objectClassName" : "ip network",
       "handle" : "XXXX-RIR",
       "startAddress" : "192.0.2.0",
       "endAddress" : "192.0.2.255",
       "ipVersion" : "v4",

Errata ID: 5666
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Andrew Newton
Date Reported: 2019-03-22

Section 3 says:

handle:           DNRs and RIRs have registry-unique identifiers that
                     may be used to specifically reference an object
                     instance.  The semantics of this data type as found
                     in this document are to be a registry-unique
                     reference to the closest enclosing object where the
                     value is found.  The data type names "registryId",
                     "roid", "nic-handle", "registrationNo", etc., are
                     terms often synonymous with this data type.  In
                     this document, the term "handle" is used.  The term
                     exposed to users by clients is a presentation issue
                     beyond the scope of this document.

It should say:

handle:           DNRs and RIRs have registry-unique identifiers that
                     may be used to specifically reference an object
                     instance.  The semantics of this data type as found
                     in this document are to be a registry-unique
                     reference to the closest enclosing object where the
                     value is found.  The data type names "registryId",
                     "roid", "nic-handle", "registrationNo", etc., are
                     terms often synonymous with this data type.  In
                     this document, the term "handle" is used.  The term
                     exposed to users by clients is a presentation issue
                     beyond the scope of this document. This value is a 
                     simple string.

Notes:

All uses of handle in section 5 call "handle" out as being a string, but if a reader were to only read section 3 they would not know it.

Report New Errata