RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (2)

RFC 3390, "Increasing TCP's Initial Window", October 2002

Source of RFC: tsvwg (tsv)

Errata ID: 4569

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Nikolai Malykh
Date Reported: 2015-12-22
Verifier Name: Martin Stiemerling
Date Verified: 2016-01-12

Section 8.1 says:

   A second set of experiments explored TCP performance over dialup
   modem links.  In experiments over a 28.8 bps dialup channel [All97a,
   AHO98], a four-segment initial window decreased the transfer time of
   a 16KB file by roughly 10%, with no accompanying increase in the drop
   rate.  A simulation study [RFC2416] investigated the effects of using
   a larger initial window on a host connected by a slow modem link and
   a router with a 3 packet buffer.  The study concluded that for the
   scenario investigated, the use of larger initial windows was not
   harmful to TCP performance.

It should say:

   A second set of experiments explored TCP performance over dialup
   modem links.  In experiments over a 28.8 kbps dialup channel [All97a,
   AHO98], a four-segment initial window decreased the transfer time of
   a 16KB file by roughly 10%, with no accompanying increase in the drop
   rate.  A simulation study [RFC2416] investigated the effects of using
   a larger initial window on a host connected by a slow modem link and
   a router with a 3 packet buffer.  The study concluded that for the
   scenario investigated, the use of larger initial windows was not
   harmful to TCP performance.

Notes:

Error bit rate - kbps instead of bps.

Errata ID: 4583

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Joe Touch
Date Reported: 2016-01-06
Verifier Name: Martin Stiemerling
Date Verified: 2016-04-03

Section 1. says:

   This increased initial window is optional: a TCP MAY start with a
   larger initial window.  However, we expect that most general-purpose
   TCP implementations would choose to use the larger initial congestion
   window given in equation (1) above.

It should say:

   This increased initial window is optional: a TCP MAY start with a
   smaller initial window.  However, we expect that most general-purpose
   TCP implementations would choose to use the larger initial congestion
   window given in equation (1) above.

Notes:

The MAY allows use of values smaller than this document allows, not larger.

Report New Errata



Search RFCs
Advanced Search
×