RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 1 record.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 2049, "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Five: Conformance Criteria and Examples", November 1996

Source of RFC: 822ext (app)

Errata ID: 3933

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Peter Occil
Date Reported: 2014-03-26
Verifier Name: Barry Leiba
Date Verified: 2014-05-07

Section 2 says:

    (10)  Conforming user agents must be able to distinguish
          encoded-words from "text", "ctext", or "word"s,
          according to the rules in section 4, anytime they
          appear in appropriate places in message headers.

It should say:

    (10)  Conforming user agents must be able to distinguish
          encoded-words from "text", "ctext", or "word"s,
          according to the rules in section 3.2.2 of [RFC5322], 
          any time they appear in appropriate places in 
          message headers.

Notes:

The correct reference at publication was Section 3.3 of RFC 822; Section 3.2.2 of RFC 5322 is currently correct. In any case, Section 4 of RFC 2049 was never right.

Report New Errata



Search RFCs
Advanced Search
×