RFC 7285

Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Protocol, September 2014

File formats:
icon for text file icon for PDF icon for HTML icon for inline errata
Status:
PROPOSED STANDARD
Updated by:
RFC 9274
Authors:
R. Alimi, Ed.
R. Penno, Ed.
Y. Yang, Ed.
S. Kiesel
S. Previdi
W. Roome
S. Shalunov
R. Woundy
Stream:
IETF
Source:
alto (ops)

Cite this RFC: TXT  |  XML  |   BibTeX

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC7285

Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing list alto@ietf.org

Other actions: View Errata  |  Submit Errata  |  Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF  |  View History of RFC 7285


Abstract

Applications using the Internet already have access to some topology information of Internet Service Provider (ISP) networks. For example, views to Internet routing tables at Looking Glass servers are available and can be practically downloaded to many network application clients. What is missing is knowledge of the underlying network topologies from the point of view of ISPs. In other words, what an ISP prefers in terms of traffic optimization -- and a way to distribute it.

The Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) services defined in this document provide network information (e.g., basic network location structure and preferences of network paths) with the goal of modifying network resource consumption patterns while maintaining or improving application performance. The basic information of ALTO is based on abstract maps of a network. These maps provide a simplified view, yet enough information about a network for applications to effectively utilize them. Additional services are built on top of the maps.

This document describes a protocol implementing the ALTO services. Although the ALTO services would primarily be provided by ISPs, other entities, such as content service providers, could also provide ALTO services. Applications that could use the ALTO services are those that have a choice to which end points to connect. Examples of such applications are peer-to-peer (P2P) and content delivery networks.


For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.

For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.




Advanced Search