RFC Number (or Subseries Number):
Title/Keyword:    
Show Abstract  Show Keywords






Any
Standards Track :: 
Best Current Practice
Informational
Experimental
Historic
Unknown
WG Acronym:
Author (surname):
Abstract contains:

11 results

NumberFilesTitleAuthorsDateMore InfoStatus
RFC 7662ASCII, PDFOAuth 2.0 Token IntrospectionJ. Richer, Ed.October 2015ErrataProposed Standard
RFC 7635ASCII, PDFSession Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Extension for Third-Party AuthorizationT. Reddy, P. Patil, R. Ravindranath, J. UbertiAugust 2015ErrataProposed Standard
RFC 7591ASCII, PDFOAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration ProtocolJ. Richer, Ed., M. Jones, J. Bradley, M. Machulak, P. HuntJuly 2015    Proposed Standard
RFC 7592ASCII, PDFOAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Management ProtocolJ. Richer, Ed., M. Jones, J. Bradley, M. MachulakJuly 2015    Experimental
RFC 7523ASCII, PDFJSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization GrantsM. Jones, B. Campbell, C. MortimoreMay 2015    Proposed Standard
RFC 7521ASCII, PDFAssertion Framework for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization GrantsB. Campbell, C. Mortimore, M. Jones, Y. GolandMay 2015    Proposed Standard
RFC 7522ASCII, PDFSecurity Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0 Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization GrantsB. Campbell, C. Mortimore, M. JonesMay 2015    Proposed Standard
RFC 7009ASCII, PDFOAuth 2.0 Token RevocationT. Lodderstedt, Ed., S. Dronia, M. ScurtescuAugust 2013    Proposed Standard
RFC 6819ASCII, PDFOAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security ConsiderationsT. Lodderstedt, Ed., M. McGloin, P. HuntJanuary 2013ErrataInformational
RFC 6749ASCII, PDFThe OAuth 2.0 Authorization FrameworkD. Hardt, Ed.October 2012Obsoletes RFC 5849, ErrataProposed Standard
RFC 6750ASCII, PDFThe OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: Bearer Token UsageM. Jones, D. HardtOctober 2012    Proposed Standard