User Tools

Site Tools


website

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
website [2012/05/07 11:15]
rsewikiadmin created
website [2015/09/29 14:22] (current)
rsewikiadmin
Line 6: Line 6:
  
  
-Problem Statement: The RFC Editor website is out of date both in terms of content and its user interface.  Feedback from users is that finding anything other than RFC and I-D is difficult.  There is a strong desire within the RFC Editor to make the site more intuitively usable, efficient, and attractive.  The current layout leaves a poor impression of the RFC Series and its relevance to modern Internet engineers.+Problem Statement: The RFC Editor website is out of date both in terms of content and its user interface and does not show up at the top of search results when searching for RFCs.  Feedback from users is that finding anything other than RFC and I-D is difficult.  There is a strong desire within the RFC Editor to make the site more intuitively usable, efficient, and attractive.  The current layout leaves a poor impression of the RFC Series and its relevance to modern Internet engineers.
  
-One goal is to avoid website design by committee.  Initial discussions with the RFC Production Center suggest that a gree-field approach would be most efficient given the current structure (or lack thereof) to the website and its underlying directory.+One goal is to avoid website design by committee.  Initial discussions with the RFC Production Center suggest that a green-field approach would be most efficient given the current structure (or lack thereof) to the website and its underlying directory.
  
 Update of specific internet drafts such as the Style Guide and Instructions 2 Authors are separate issues.   Update of specific internet drafts such as the Style Guide and Instructions 2 Authors are separate issues.  
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 RSE Actions: RSE Actions:
-  * Collect initial [[webreq|requirements]] from RFC Production Center & Publisher, RSAG +  * Collect initial [[webreq|requirements]] from RFC Production Center & Publisher, RSAG - *DONE* 
-  * Determine if any other related projects are happening in the streams (*DONE* - no other current activities) +  * Determine if any other related projects are happening in the streams *DONE*  
-  * Create an RFP to solicit bids on updating the space; send to RFC Production Center and Publisher for input on text of the RFP +    * There is a SoW for an IETF website redesign; that is a much larger and complex project than the RFC Editor website, and will result in a different look-and-feel 
-  * Get approval from RSOC to proceed with publishing RFP +  * Create an RFP to solicit bids on updating the space; send to RFC Production Center and Publisher for input on text of the RFP - *DONE* 
-  * submit to RFC Publisher for updating+  * Get approval from RSOC and IAOC for the proposal *DONE* 
 +  * Oversee the project schedule and provide updates to the community as appropriate *IN PROGRESS* 
 +    * [[webfeedback|Collected feedback to prioritize for incremental improvement of the new site]]
  
  
 RSOC Actions: RSOC Actions:
-  * feedback welcome; no action required+  * Need input on project funding proposal
  
  
Line 40: Line 42:
 Reputation: current site is an embarrassment Reputation: current site is an embarrassment
  
-Estimated completion date: TBD+Estimated completion date: September 2015
website.1336414517.txt.gz · Last modified: 2012/05/07 11:15 by rsewikiadmin