This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
webfeedback [2015/10/13 14:20] rsewikiadmin |
webfeedback [2015/10/13 14:29] rsewikiadmin |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
^7 | The rfc errata summary table doesn' | ^7 | The rfc errata summary table doesn' | ||
^ 8 | re clicking on “Browse RFCs by Status” & Best Current Practice I get a randomized list of 25 BCPs. it would seem to me that if the title is “Browse RFCs by Status” _ would get all the BCPs (or maybe the 1st 25) in order the same is true for the other categories as well | Investigating | | ^ 8 | re clicking on “Browse RFCs by Status” & Best Current Practice I get a randomized list of 25 BCPs. it would seem to me that if the title is “Browse RFCs by Status” _ would get all the BCPs (or maybe the 1st 25) in order the same is true for the other categories as well | Investigating | | ||
- | ^9 | re: clicking on Official Internet Protocol Standards. I get an ordered list of internet standards some of which are missing (e.g. STD 1 & STD 2) and some of which show up in more than one box (e.g., STD 5 & 13) seems like this needs more work imo - all std #s should appear once (even to say “not issued”) and only once & include all the RFCs that make up a STD the current format makes it hard to say what STD 13 (for example) consists of | There is an option to show/hide retired STD numbers; current default is to hide. Will switch | + | ^9 | re: clicking on Official Internet Protocol Standards. I get an ordered list of internet standards some of which are missing (e.g. STD 1 & STD 2) and some of which show up in more than one box (e.g., STD 5 & 13) seems like this needs more work imo - all std #s should appear once (even to say “not issued”) and only once & include all the RFCs that make up a STD the current format makes it hard to say what STD 13 (for example) consists of | There is an option to show/hide retired STD numbers; current default is to hide. After further discussion, will leave as is and add more text to indicate what can be shown | |
^10 | re: RFC Status Changes. this is incomplete- e.g. RFC 1058 is missing | ^10 | re: RFC Status Changes. this is incomplete- e.g. RFC 1058 is missing | ||
^11 | Serving up your own version of jQuery, Reponsive Menu, and so on instead of using the widely-cached ones means that if there are security bugs found in them (which there are), you will continue to serve the buggy versions long after the bugs have been fixed. | WordPress default. Will investigate using public version post-cutover. | | ^11 | Serving up your own version of jQuery, Reponsive Menu, and so on instead of using the widely-cached ones means that if there are security bugs found in them (which there are), you will continue to serve the buggy versions long after the bugs have been fixed. | WordPress default. Will investigate using public version post-cutover. | |