User Tools

Site Tools


webfeedback

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
webfeedback [2015/10/13 14:15]
rsewikiadmin
webfeedback [2015/10/13 14:29]
rsewikiadmin
Line 10: Line 10:
 ^7      | The rfc errata summary table doesn't adapt well to widths less than 1212px | Investigating |  ^7      | The rfc errata summary table doesn't adapt well to widths less than 1212px | Investigating | 
 ^ 8    | re clicking on “Browse RFCs by Status” & Best Current Practice I get a randomized list of 25 BCPs. it would seem to me that if the title is “Browse RFCs by Status” _ would get all the BCPs (or maybe the 1st 25) in order the same is true for the other categories as well | Investigating |  ^ 8    | re clicking on “Browse RFCs by Status” & Best Current Practice I get a randomized list of 25 BCPs. it would seem to me that if the title is “Browse RFCs by Status” _ would get all the BCPs (or maybe the 1st 25) in order the same is true for the other categories as well | Investigating | 
-^9     | re: clicking on Official Internet Protocol Standards. I get an ordered list of internet standards some of which are missing (e.g. STD 1 & STD 2) and some of which show up in more than one box (e.g., STD 5 & 13) seems like this needs more work  imo - all std #s should appear once (even to say “not issued”) and only once & include all the RFCs that make up a STD the current format makes it hard to say what STD 13 (for example) consists of  | There is an option to show/hide retired STD numbers; current default is to hide. Will switch to show for default |+^9     | re: clicking on Official Internet Protocol Standards. I get an ordered list of internet standards some of which are missing (e.g. STD 1 & STD 2) and some of which show up in more than one box (e.g., STD 5 & 13) seems like this needs more work  imo - all std #s should appear once (even to say “not issued”) and only once & include all the RFCs that make up a STD the current format makes it hard to say what STD 13 (for example) consists of  | There is an option to show/hide retired STD numbers; current default is to hide. After further discussion, will leave as is and add more text to indicate what can be shown |
 ^10    | re: RFC Status Changes. this is incomplete- e.g. RFC 1058 is missing  (I do not know if any other RFCs are also missing). More important - in a number of cases a RFC was written (in the case of RFC 1058 it was RFC 1923) that said why the 1st RFC was made historic - I think it is very important to include any such RFCs in this list so the readers can find out what happened - there is good information in some of these (no so good in others - RFC 4450) many of these RFCs can be found by searching for Historic in the index  | Investigating | ^10    | re: RFC Status Changes. this is incomplete- e.g. RFC 1058 is missing  (I do not know if any other RFCs are also missing). More important - in a number of cases a RFC was written (in the case of RFC 1058 it was RFC 1923) that said why the 1st RFC was made historic - I think it is very important to include any such RFCs in this list so the readers can find out what happened - there is good information in some of these (no so good in others - RFC 4450) many of these RFCs can be found by searching for Historic in the index  | Investigating |
 ^11    | Serving up your own version of jQuery, Reponsive Menu, and so on instead of using the widely-cached ones means that if there are security bugs found in them (which there are), you will continue to serve the buggy versions long after the bugs have been fixed. | WordPress default. Will investigate using public version post-cutover. | ^11    | Serving up your own version of jQuery, Reponsive Menu, and so on instead of using the widely-cached ones means that if there are security bugs found in them (which there are), you will continue to serve the buggy versions long after the bugs have been fixed. | WordPress default. Will investigate using public version post-cutover. |
Line 25: Line 25:
 ^22    | Chrome on the iPhone worked too, but took a good 10 seconds to respond. | Investigating; not enough information | ^22    | Chrome on the iPhone worked too, but took a good 10 seconds to respond. | Investigating; not enough information |
 ^23    | My only nit is that whoever designed the look is too much in love with gray boxes and grey shadows... | Holding off on the color conversation. | ^23    | My only nit is that whoever designed the look is too much in love with gray boxes and grey shadows... | Holding off on the color conversation. |
-^24    | The grey box in the middle makes it hard to read the text. Lightening it would help a lot.  | Wontfix |+^24    | The grey box in the middle makes it hard to read the text. Lightening it would help a lot.  | Won't fix |
 ^25    | One comment though on the "recent RFCs" right-hand side column.  I wonder if this wouldn't make sense to consolidate the different views of a RFC. | To discuss further with the IESG | ^25    | One comment though on the "recent RFCs" right-hand side column.  I wonder if this wouldn't make sense to consolidate the different views of a RFC. | To discuss further with the IESG |
 ^26    | Re: errata page - The text is all shown in a grey background block in the middle of the page, which is fine, but for some reason when there's a blank line in quoted text, that displays as a white bar across the block.  There's a thin darker grey line between errata, but for me at least it's hard to see.  White bars would be a nice separator between the errata | Investigating | ^26    | Re: errata page - The text is all shown in a grey background block in the middle of the page, which is fine, but for some reason when there's a blank line in quoted text, that displays as a white bar across the block.  There's a thin darker grey line between errata, but for me at least it's hard to see.  White bars would be a nice separator between the errata | Investigating |
webfeedback.txt · Last modified: 2015/10/13 14:29 by rsewikiadmin