This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
streamquery [2012/08/26 14:04] rsewikiadmin created |
streamquery [2013/04/03 16:52] rsewikiadmin |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Questions for an organization requesting to be considered as a new Stream in to the RFC Series | + | ====== |
- | 1 - Why the RFC Series and not Kantara or OASIS or another umbrella | + | 1 - Why the RFC Series and not a different |
2 - Do you anticipate your organization being a persistent entity for the next 5-10 years? | 2 - Do you anticipate your organization being a persistent entity for the next 5-10 years? | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
3 - The RFC Series has some particular points of style and format that must be consistent across the streams. | 3 - The RFC Series has some particular points of style and format that must be consistent across the streams. | ||
- | ---- | + | 4 - How many documents do you expect to request |
- | Questions for the RSE, IAB, and whoever else needs to be involved in determining whether | + | |
- | 1 - What type of documents are allowed? | + | ====== Requirements for any group or organization to be considered as a new stream ====== |
+ | * Organization and documents must focus on improving technology or best practices for the Internet | ||
+ | * Open process for creation of documents | ||
+ | * Free | ||
+ | * Accept the RFC Series format and style guide | ||
+ | * Organization and documentation must be Community supported, not vendor driven | ||
+ | * Documents need to be of a quality such that the RFC Editor can edit them in a reasonable fashion (If there are enough documents that would require weeks of editing, beyond what is in our current SLA with the IETF, then that's a problem) | ||
+ | ====== Questions for the RSE, IAB, and whoever else needs to be involved in determining whether a new Stream should be created (TBD) ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. What type of documents are allowed? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Suggested Action Items for New Stream Creation ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Establish a list of questions to determine suitability (see above). | ||
+ | 2. Require a new I-D from the supplicant describing their process, IPR policy, etc., for RSE and RSOC review. | ||
+ | 3. Create a contract & SLA based on expected number of documents (example: will require funding for at least 15 documents a year, no refund if not that many, will require additional funds if more). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Suggestion Action Items for closing a stream ====== | ||
+ | 1. Either side may conclude the stream if funding or quality of documents run dry | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Other actions to consider ====== | ||
+ | * A new stream will need to be prepared to define their processes in an RFC. Current stream documents: | ||
+ | * RFC5745 " | ||
+ | * RFC5744 " | ||
+ | * RFC5743 " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Responses to date ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[refeds|REFEDs responses]] |