start
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
start [2015/10/02 12:31] rsewikiadmin |
start [2022/06/10 11:30] (current) arusso |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ==== Immediate | + | **NOTE: This wiki is an archive of RFC Series Editor (RSE) pages created from 2012-2019.\\ |
| + | For current information, | ||
| + | |||
| + | --------------------------- | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Priorities | ||
| - [[rfcformat|RFC Format]] | - [[rfcformat|RFC Format]] | ||
| - | - [[dig-arc-pol|Digital Archive Policy]] | + | - [[fifty|Fifty Years of RFCs]] |
| - | - [[stats|Statistics | + | |
| + | - [[outreach|Develop an outreach plan]] | ||
| + | - Clarify issues around Streams | ||
| + | - [[satsurvey|Customer Satisfaction Survey experiment]] | ||
| + | - Revise SLA (possibly a 2020 item) | ||
| ==== The RSE Project List ==== | ==== The RSE Project List ==== | ||
| Line 9: | Line 18: | ||
| ^ Priority ^ Handle ^ Brief Description ^ Target start ^ | ^ Priority ^ Handle ^ Brief Description ^ Target start ^ | ||
| | C | [[acronym|Acronym review]] | The current list of approved acronyms (one that do not need to be expanded in RFC) needs to be reviewed and brought up to date or entirely discarded | | | | C | [[acronym|Acronym review]] | The current list of approved acronyms (one that do not need to be expanded in RFC) needs to be reviewed and brought up to date or entirely discarded | | | ||
| + | | A | [[fifty|Fifty Years of RFCs]] | RFC to document and other announcements in relation to the fiftieth anniversary of RFC 1 | September 2018 | | ||
| === Medium-sized projects (6-18 months from start of project) === | === Medium-sized projects (6-18 months from start of project) === | ||
| ^ Priority ^ Handle ^ Brief Description ^ Target start ^ | ^ Priority ^ Handle ^ Brief Description ^ Target start ^ | ||
| - | | B | [[dig-arc-pol|Digital Archive Policy]] | Create a formal digital archive policy for the Series | January 2015 | | + | | A | [[auth48|AUTH48 changes]] | can we improve efficiency of AUTH48 process by potentially clarifying policy and implementing new tools to streamline the process? |
| - | | C | [[auth48|AUTH48 changes]] | can we improve efficiency of AUTH48 process by potentially clarifying policy and implementing new tools to streamline the process? | + | | B | [[errata|Errata process review]] | submitting errata and citing errata is non-trivial and the overall process around the errata service needs to be reviewed | | |
| - | | B | [[errata|Errata process review]] | submitting errata and citing errata is non-trivial and the overall process around the errata service needs to be reviewed | January 2015 | | + | | C | [[scholarindex|Scholarly indexing]] | RFC are not indexed in online indexes such as: ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore | | |
| - | | C | [[scholarindex|Scholarly indexing]] | RFC are not indexed in online indexes such as: ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar | + | |
| | C | [[shortlivedref|Short-lived references]] | some references might not be long-lived enough from an archival perspective, | | C | [[shortlivedref|Short-lived references]] | some references might not be long-lived enough from an archival perspective, | ||
| - | | B | [[stats|Statistics and Metrics]] | look at more effective ways to report on RFC stats and determine if/how this fits in to current SLA | January 2016 | | ||
| | B | [[citation|Citation Library Updates]] | Formalize RFC Editor support of the citation library | | | | B | [[citation|Citation Library Updates]] | Formalize RFC Editor support of the citation library | | | ||
| - | | C | [[EU-ICT|EU-ISA]] | Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA) and the RFC Series | | | + | | A | [[satsurvey|Customer Satisfaction Survey experiment]] | Develop |
| - | | C | [[code|RFC Source Code Repository]] | Research issues around the creation of a source code repository for the RFC Series | + | |
| Line 29: | Line 35: | ||
| | A | [[rfcformat|RFC Format]] | Determine the future of images, character encoding, and archival format | March 2012 | | | A | [[rfcformat|RFC Format]] | Determine the future of images, character encoding, and archival format | March 2012 | | ||
| | B | [[EFL|EFL Author support]] | Work with RPC, community to find ways to support EFL authors more effectively | ongoing | | B | [[EFL|EFL Author support]] | Work with RPC, community to find ways to support EFL authors more effectively | ongoing | ||
| + | | B | [[rfced-infrastructure|Infrastructure/ | ||
| + | | B | [[outreach|Outreach]] | Create an outreach plan for the RFC Editor | ongoing | | ||
| Line 35: | Line 43: | ||
| | | [[xml-outsource|Outsourcing XML review]] | Should the review of the XML file be outsourced? | | | | [[xml-outsource|Outsourcing XML review]] | Should the review of the XML file be outsourced? | | ||
| | | [[metadata-preservation|Understanding the role of metadata in digital preservation]] | Review of digital preservation policy and existing RFC metadata | | | | [[metadata-preservation|Understanding the role of metadata in digital preservation]] | Review of digital preservation policy and existing RFC metadata | | ||
| - | | | [[context-search|Search response improvements ]] | Providing additional context to search returns, e.g. pointers to WG | | + | | | [[context-search|Search response improvements ]] | Providing additional context to search returns, e.g., pointers to WG | |
| | | [[exp-RFC|Create an experimental space for RFC formats or features ]] | Consider having a place to test new formats or features for RFCs | | | | [[exp-RFC|Create an experimental space for RFC formats or features ]] | Consider having a place to test new formats or features for RFCs | | ||
| + | | | [[code|RFC Source Code Repository]] | Research issues around the creation of a source code repository for the RFC Series | | | ||
| + | | | [[EU-ICT|EU-ISA]] | Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA) and the RFC Series | | | ||
| Line 50: | Line 59: | ||
| | [[stylemanualrfc|Style Manual RFC]] | Update of current accepted practice to be published as a new RFC | revised style guide approved for publication April 2014 | | | [[stylemanualrfc|Style Manual RFC]] | Update of current accepted practice to be published as a new RFC | revised style guide approved for publication April 2014 | | ||
| | [[stylemanualweb|Style Manual web]] | Creation of proto-policies, | | [[stylemanualweb|Style Manual web]] | Creation of proto-policies, | ||
| - | | [[archive|Digital Preservation Policy]] | Review of archival process and policy for the Series | + | | [[scholarindex|Scholarly indexing]] | RFC are now properly indexed in Google Scholar |
| | [[DOI|DOI assignment]] | DOI assignments have been requested for RFCs as a way to improve the scholarly reputation of the Series | DOIs added April 2015 | | | [[DOI|DOI assignment]] | DOI assignments have been requested for RFCs as a way to improve the scholarly reputation of the Series | DOIs added April 2015 | | ||
| | [[website|RFC Editor website]] | update content, look and feel to the RFC Editor website. | New site published October 2015 | | | [[website|RFC Editor website]] | update content, look and feel to the RFC Editor website. | New site published October 2015 | | ||
| + | | [[stats|Statistics and Metrics]] | automating stats reporting | moved into production in July 2016| | ||
| + | | [[dig-sig|Digital Signatures]] | digitally signing RFCs | project shelved due to concerns re: revocation October 2016 | | ||
| + | | [[dig-arc-pol|Digital Archive Policy]] | develop framework for how to handle digital preservation | two partnerships (National Library of Sweden, Computer History Museum) in place; RFC 8153 published | | ||
| + | |||
start.1443814318.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/10/02 12:31 by rsewikiadmin
Page Tools
