This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
— |
shortlivedref [2012/05/07 11:37] (current) rsewikiadmin created |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | Parent issue: Short-lived references | ||
+ | Size (time): 6-18 months from start | ||
+ | Importance/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Problem Statement: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Current thinking of the RSE is that the RFC Editor should not be responsible for creating a document archive outside of the RFC directly. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | RSE Actions: | ||
+ | * Determine need for an archive | ||
+ | * Create cost/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | RSOC Actions: | ||
+ | * Provide input on need, cost | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | RFC Production Center & Publisher Actions: | ||
+ | * Provide input on need, cost | ||
+ | * Implement if approved | ||
+ | * Create tools to return archived docs (possibly just html pointers?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Costs/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Financial: minimal hardware costs, but would require a percentage of an FTE for review of copyright | ||
+ | |||
+ | Project schedules: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Reputation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Estimated completion date: TBD |