Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- newstream [2012/08/26 13:59]
rsewikiadmin
+++ newstream [2013/07/16 17:30]
rsewikiadmin added proposal
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 RSE Actions:
   * Open discussion with [[https://refeds.org/|REFEDs]], keeping RSOC and RPC informed
-    * List of [[streamquery|questions]] for a new stream and REFEDs responses
+    * List of [[streamquery|questions]] for a new stream
   * Explore any reasonable alternatives (a new, separate contract with AMS? Feed REFED docs through the Independent Stream? Other?)
   * Formula for financial costs potentially associated with a new Stream?
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
   * provide input on how to determine quality
+Current proposal (from the Independent Submissions Editor) :
+. When one of those organisations makes an Independent Submission, it
+   would be in the form of an Internet Draft, with a paragraph in its
+   introduction clearly stating how it was developed, how it was
+   reviewed, and how strong a consensus it achieved.
+. The ISE would review it (like any other submission), and possibly
+   get some reviews from the IETF community so as to check that it
+   clearly was of interest to the Internet Community, i.e. the
+   readers and users of RFCs.
+. When satisfied that the draft is suitable for publishing, the
+   ISE could ask the ISEB to see whether any of them object to its
+   being published because it did not seem to be of interest
+   to our community.
+. After that the document would go to IESG for its 5742 review,
+   then - after any final improvements - it would be published.
 Costs/Benefits

RSE Wiki Archive

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools