This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
interim [2019/09/13 11:46] rsewikiadmin added link to meeting report for 13 Sept meeting |
interim [2019/09/26 03:59] rsewikiadmin added context text |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== RFC Editor Model - Virtual Interim Meetings ====== | ====== RFC Editor Model - Virtual Interim Meetings ====== | ||
+ | The RFC Series has come to a crossroads where questions must be answered regarding how the Series should be managed, the role of the RFC Series Editor, and the oversight of the RFC Editor function. The RFC Editor publishes RFCs for the IETF, the IRTF, the IAB, and the Independent Submissions stream. Those RFCs are referred to by other Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), by organizations and governments in their procurement processes, by academics, and more. Decisions on the future of the RFC Editor and the RFC Series needs to include input from both the producers and the consumers of RFCs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I am reaching out to different groups and organizations so that they may be a part of figuring out how to answer those questions. It is worth noting that I am not trying to get to a final answer on what the future of the RFC Editor and the RFC Series should be; I’m trying to reach consensus on who should be making those decisions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is not an IETF or IRTF activity, but we are holding this discussion under the IETF and IRTF policies described in the Note Well (https:// | ||
+ | |||
=== Slides === | === Slides === | ||
{{ : | {{ : |