User Tools

Site Tools


github_exp_2021_feedback

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision Both sides next revision
github_exp_2021_feedback [2021/02/23 23:02]
arusso created
github_exp_2021_feedback [2021/02/24 21:58]
sginoza
Line 7: Line 7:
 === Lessons Learned === === Lessons Learned ===
  
-  * The RPC needs to control the repository. Not the authors+  * The RPC needs to control the repository.
   * The subject line of an issue needs to be succinct since the GUI truncates after 56 chars   * The subject line of an issue needs to be succinct since the GUI truncates after 56 chars
   * Each issue must contain just one topic.   * Each issue must contain just one topic.
Line 21: Line 21:
 Things I liked - Being able to refer to issues and PRs with hashtags and have GitHub build hyperlinks in comments and commit messages. Automatic closure of issues when a PR was accepted is satisfying. Tracking of open issues is easy. Things I liked - Being able to refer to issues and PRs with hashtags and have GitHub build hyperlinks in comments and commit messages. Automatic closure of issues when a PR was accepted is satisfying. Tracking of open issues is easy.
  
-Things that were meh - interacting with Git and GitHub is not quick. Like other uses of GitHub I've seen in the IETF, technical discussions erupt on individual issues (see [[https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/issues/843|#843]], which predated the AUTH48 issues but wasn'noticed by the authors until almost all the AUTH48 issues had been closed), and participants are slow to take the issue to a broader audience/ML (see [[https://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c238/2021-January/001306.html|the start of the email discussion]]).+Things that were meh - interacting with Git and GitHub is not quick. Like other uses of GitHub I've seen in the IETF, technical discussions erupt on individual issues (see [[https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/issues/843|#843]], which predated the AUTH48 issues but wasn'addressed by the authors until almost all the AUTH48 issues had been closed), and participants are slow to take the issue to a broader audience/ML (see [[https://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c238/2021-January/001306.html|the start of the email discussion]]).
  
 Things that I would change next go around - the RPC should control the repo, which would allow us to merge the changes and add the right people as contributors so that they can (maybe) receive notifications (it may be a horse-to-water problem). Things that I would change next go around - the RPC should control the repo, which would allow us to merge the changes and add the right people as contributors so that they can (maybe) receive notifications (it may be a horse-to-water problem).
  
  
github_exp_2021_feedback.txt ยท Last modified: 2021/05/18 14:32 by sginoza