User Tools

Site Tools


erratasystem:complaints

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
erratasystem:complaints [2014/12/23 11:01]
rsewikiadmin created
erratasystem:complaints [2015/01/08 16:31] (current)
rsewikiadmin
Line 1: Line 1:
 +  The errata system is a bespoke system with all the associated 
 +  quirks and there is no good reason why we couldn't re-define 
 +  errata so that they  are those things handled by some OSS s/w 
 +  that we pick.
 +
 ===Complaints/Concerns=== ===Complaints/Concerns===
   - It takes too much of an AD's or the ISE's time to read, review, and verify or reject errata.   - It takes too much of an AD's or the ISE's time to read, review, and verify or reject errata.
   - "It's not a bug tracking system and each time someone fills a bogus errata it adds burden on protocol implementers."   - "It's not a bug tracking system and each time someone fills a bogus errata it adds burden on protocol implementers."
   - Searching for serious errata when faced with an unprioritized list is hard.   - Searching for serious errata when faced with an unprioritized list is hard.
-    - Most individual errata are not actually important; need to be able to quickly distinguish between what is and isn't important+    - Most individual errata are not actually important; the community needs to be able to quickly distinguish between what is and isn't important
  
  
 ===Tangential concerns - in scope?=== ===Tangential concerns - in scope?===
   - Desire for a system that acts as an idea-for-document-update repository   - Desire for a system that acts as an idea-for-document-update repository
erratasystem/complaints.1419361301.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2014/12/23 11:01 by rsewikiadmin