User Tools

Site Tools


doi

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
doi [2013/01/17 15:49]
rsewikiadmin created
doi [2014/01/10 18:54] (current)
rsewikiadmin
Line 6: Line 6:
  
  
-Problem Statement:  When documenting authored publications, academic researchers rely on Digital Object Identifiers (DOIassigned to their publications.  In order to encourage the reputation and value of the Series to academic researchers, adding DOIs to all published RFCs is being considered as a possibility+Problem Statement:  When documenting authored publications, researchers often rely on Digital Object Identifiers ([[http://www.doi.org/]]) to find, cite, and report on their publication activity.  In some cases, publications do not count as professional publications if a DOI is not assigned.  In order to encourage the reputation and value of the Series to academic researchers, adding DOIs to all published RFCs is being considered as a possibility.  Using DOIs to uniquely identify publications is considered a standard best practice among the scientific, technical, and medical publishing community.
  
  
 RSE Actions: RSE Actions:
   * Determine cost and potential value   * Determine cost and potential value
-    Note that as of 17-January-2013, 688 RFCs have been authored by one or more individuals with institute, college, or university as their affiliation (assumed from the author addresses section); this is 10% of the whole of the Series at this time+  Present business case and high level project plan to RSOC 
 +  * Work with John Levine on DOI draft (see [[http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-doi/]])
  
  
 RSOC Actions: RSOC Actions:
-  * none at this time+  * review plan, approve membership with CrossRef.org
  
  
 RFC Production Center & Publisher Actions: RFC Production Center & Publisher Actions:
-  * Assuming that DOIs would only be added to the info pages for each RFC, +  * Determine what programming will be required 
-    How much programming would be involved to +  Help create project plan 
-      add this field to the info pages? +  Code changes to include information in database, create necessary APIs to register DOI numbers with CrosRef 
-      add a search field for DOI to the search page?+  Adjust Procedures Manual accordingly 
  
 Costs/Benefits Costs/Benefits
-Financial: TBD+Financial:  
 +  * From EZID - http://n2t.net/ezid 
 +    * "An annual subscription for a non-profit organization is $2,500 per year. This entitles the organization to up to 1 million identifiers per year, both DOIs and ARKs. You would have a unique prefix assigned to your organization" 
 +  * From CrossRef - http://www.crossref.org 
 + 
 +   CrossRef Fees, initial 
 +   Annual Fee = $275 
 +   Deposit Fee (2012-2014) = (610 * 1.00) = $610  
 +   Deposit Fee (pre-2012) = (6491 * .15) = $973.65 
 +   Total est. for of January 1, 2014 = $1913.65 
 +   Ongoing = $330 (annual fee) + $350 (total yearly deposit fee) 
 + 
 +While a subscription service is possible for $2500/year, given the number of RFC's published (approx 350/year) a per document service like CrossRef.org makes more sense for the Series.
  
 Project schedules:  Project schedules: 
Line 32: Line 46:
  
 Estimated completion date: TBD Estimated completion date: TBD
 +
 +---
 +
 +Note on API for EZID
 +The API documentation is here: http://n2t.net/ezid/doc/apidoc.html
 + 
 +The API test user account
 +user name: apitest
 +password: apitest
 + 
 +This is a shared account, and the identifiers created are subject to deletion after 2 weeks. 
doi.1358466590.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/01/17 15:49 by rsewikiadmin