This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
dig-arc-pol [2013/12/16 16:27] rsewikiadmin created |
dig-arc-pol [2015/08/03 14:27] rsewikiadmin |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Parent issue: Digital Preservation Policy | Parent issue: Digital Preservation Policy | ||
- | Size (time): | + | Size (time): |
Importance/ | Importance/ | ||
- | Problem Statement: A Digital Preservation Policy helps address the inherent instability of digital media by providing a plan for technological obsolescence and a long-term plan for the continued authenticity and integrity of the digital records (RFCs and their associated metadata). | + | Problem Statement: A Digital Preservation Policy helps address the inherent instability of digital media by providing a plan for technological obsolescence and a long-term plan for the continued authenticity and integrity of the digital records (RFCs and their associated metadata). |
- | + | Pros: Will allow for a better financial planning given a documented cycle for review and updates to the documents. | |
- | Pros: Will allow for a better financial planning given a documented cycle for review and updates to the documents. | + | |
Cons: This will add a known cost to the maintenance of the RFC Series. | Cons: This will add a known cost to the maintenance of the RFC Series. | ||
Note: [[metadata-preservation]] is dependent on this project | Note: [[metadata-preservation]] is dependent on this project | ||
+ | |||
+ | see: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Timeline: | ||
+ | * September 2014: incorporate archive/ | ||
+ | * October 2014: incorporate RSAG input; release as a -00 draft to start community input | ||
+ | * November 2014: topic for RFC Format session | ||
+ | * Q1 2015: incorporate updates; propose as an IAB stream draft | ||
+ | * publication not sought until format work comes closer to reality | ||
+ | |||
+ |