User Tools

Site Tools


design:html-requirements

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
design:html-requirements [2014/09/15 11:27]
rsewikiadmin
design:html-requirements [2014/09/15 13:03]
rsewikiadmin
Line 120: Line 120:
 > draft be changed from "<div id='abstract'>" to "<div class='abstract'>" and  > draft be changed from "<div id='abstract'>" to "<div class='abstract'>" and 
 > that we specify classes for all sections that seem to have special meanings. > that we specify classes for all sections that seem to have special meanings.
 +
 +> It's not clear what "same logic" in "Paragraphs are wrapped in <div>s using 
 +> the same logic as sections" means. Is this intending to talk about how id 
 +> attributes get placed, or something else? 
 +
 +
 +> The document says "Additionally, anchors expressed in the source XML should 
 +> be exposed as anchors in the HTML as well." I suggested in my nits message 
 +> striking "Additionally," and "as well". But it occurs to me that the document 
 +> needs to be more specific and reflect _how_ the source XML allows anchors to 
 +> be expressed, and how those will be translated into the HTML. This falls, I 
 +> think, into being clearer about author-provided and autogenerated ids.
 +
 +> There's text that says to wrap section numbers in an 
 +> <a class='self-ref' href=...>. I suspect this should apply to other <a href> 
 +> that are generated?
 +
 +> The paragraph that begins "For other block items, such as <figure>, <t>, 
 +> and <texttable> is talking about XML, not HTML. Can it be rewritten more 
 +> specifically in terms of input and output? 
 +
design/html-requirements.txt ยท Last modified: 2014/09/17 07:28 by rsewikiadmin