Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- design:html-requirements [2014/09/15 08:25]
rsewikiadmin
+++ design:html-requirements [2014/09/15 12:59]
rsewikiadmin
@@ Line 97: / Line 97: @@
 > also suspect we should be pulling out a section explicitly discussing
 > these ids).
+====Other open issues====
+> What prefixes to use for autogenerated tags?
+> Should an RFC style document encourage authors to use common tags for
+> things like "Security Considerations," "IANA Considerations," etc., to
+> help solve for the problem of intuitive pointers to common sections in
+> RFCs?
+(so far, Design Team has had one yes, one no)
+> What reference to use (if any) for HTML5?
+> Where is the line between indicating what the XML should do within the HTML
+> for things like ASCII art, packet diagrams, etc, and what is appropriately
+> just information for the XML draft?
+> Should the HTML tags in the Appendixes stay (and get cleaned up) or be removed?
+>
+> Using classes instead of ids to aid with styling.
+> This is a very good point. If others agree, I would propose that the current
+> draft be changed from "<div id='abstract'>" to "<div class='abstract'>" and
+> that we specify classes for all sections that seem to have special meanings.
+> It's not clear what "same logic" in "Paragraphs are wrapped in <div>s using
+> the same logic as sections" means. Is this intending to talk about how id
+> attributes get placed, or something else?

RSE Wiki Archive