User Tools

Site Tools


design:format-and-content-rfcs

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
design:format-and-content-rfcs [2014/09/29 09:28]
paul
design:format-and-content-rfcs [2014/10/25 14:58] (current)
paul Cleaned this up a bit
Line 1: Line 1:
-The v3 vocabulary will be used as part of the new RFC series format described in [[http://​www.rfc-editor.org/​info/​rfc6949|RFC 6949]]. ​ RFCs+The v3 vocabulary will be used as part of the new RFC series format described in [[http://​www.rfc-editor.org/​info/​rfc6949|RFC 6949]]. 
 +See [[https://​tools.ietf.org/​html/​draft-hoffman-xml2rfc|draft-hoffman-xml2rfc]] for more information 
 +about the v3 vocabulary. 
 + 
 + 
 +RFCs
 will have multiple representations:​ the canonical document will be in XML using the v3 format, and will have multiple representations:​ the canonical document will be in XML using the v3 format, and
 many non- canonical representations (such as HTML and text) will be generated as well. many non- canonical representations (such as HTML and text) will be generated as well.
- +The discussion of the design and content of RFCs is part of the overall discussion of 
-See [[https://​tools.ietf.org/​html/​draft-hoffman-xml2rfc|draft-hoffman-xml2rfc]] for more information+[[https://​tools.ietf.org/​html/​draft-flanagan-rfc-framework|the RFC framework]].
  
 ======Canonical RFCs====== ======Canonical RFCs======
Line 30: Line 35:
  
   * <​cref>​ elements   * <​cref>​ elements
 +
 +  * any TAB characters
  
 The RFC Processor will have a mode that gives hard errors on all of the above other than <​cref>​ The RFC Processor will have a mode that gives hard errors on all of the above other than <​cref>​
Line 46: Line 53:
 non-canonical representations means that there will be much more emphasis put on the RFC Processor. non-canonical representations means that there will be much more emphasis put on the RFC Processor.
  
-// Stuff will go on the web page about each non-canonical +The following sections list the current Internet Drafts ​on the non-canonical ​formats. At this time (October 2014), these drafts are still in active development,​ with significant changes still being made.
-representation//+
  
 =====RFCs in HTML===== =====RFCs in HTML=====
 +
 +[[https://​tools.ietf.org/​html/​draft-hildebrand-html-rfc|draft-hildebrand-html-rfc]]
 +describes the HTML representation of RFCs.
  
 =====RFCs in PDF===== =====RFCs in PDF=====
 +
 +[[https://​tools.ietf.org/​html/​draft-hansen-rfc-use-of-pdf|draft-hansen-rfc-use-of-pdf]]
 +describes the PDF representation of RFCs.
  
 =====RFCs in Text===== =====RFCs in Text=====
  
 +[[https://​tools.ietf.org/​html/​draft-flanagan-plaintext|draft-flanagan-plaintext]]
 +describes the plain text representation of RFCs.
design/format-and-content-rfcs.txt · Last modified: 2014/10/25 14:58 by paul