===== v3 guidance received ===== This is a summary of guidance received; it is not a comprehensive list. "–>" indicates the takeaways of the guidance received.\\ "See" indicates where this info is captured in more detail. (All items are already captured in this wiki, [[https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/xml2rfc-doc.html|the schema documentation]], or the [[https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/FAQ-xml2rfcv3.html|FAQ]].) - artwork vs. sourcecode determination (revisited Sept 2020) * –> contains a diagram or similar. (“character-based art, diagrams of message layouts, and so on” to quote https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/xml2rfc-doc.html) * –> contains code that compiles or does not; it can be one of the preferred type values or no type at all; this includes snippets of code or pseudocode. * See [[v3_artwork_tips]] (internal) - guidance on element (April and Dec. 2020) * –> use it for any individual’s name, regardless of whether it requires non-ASCII characters, and regardless of whether the individual is already tagged as elsewhere. [original practice] * -> Feb 2021: guidance revised to only use in Contributors, Acks, IAB Members, and "Contact" in IANA Considerations. Also, use when needed to hold an individual's name that contains non-ASCII characters. * Henrik advised using it for any organization’s name. * -> [This does not match current practice. RPC will not start using it in that manner.] * -> Feb 2021: Confirmed not using it for organizations. (Exception: if the org is the source of the doc.) * See [[v3_examples#contributors_using_contact]] and [[v3_examples#acknowledgments_using_contact]] (internal) - questions about handling and entity handling (Aug 2020) * –> usage of should be replaced by * is deprecated per [[https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/xml2rfc-doc.html#name-elements-from-v2-that-have-b|Section 3.2 of schema doc]] * –> odd entities defined by the authors may be replaced by the equivalent text. - general guidance on choosing the right element for specific content (June 2020) * –> Considerations when choosing appropriate markup * Aesthetic: Does the output look right? * Semantic: Is it an accurate label for the data? * Does it match precedent? (i.e., the markup of similar text in past v3 RFCs.) * [Perhaps also worth including ease/efficiency, i.e., what is simpler?] * See [[v3_tricky_ones]] (internal) - guidance on attributes (June 2020 questions from Jean) * –> for scaling issues, remove height and width attributes; increase 3rd number in viewBox. * See [[svg]] (internal) - using
    to get indentation should be avoided (June 2020) * -> In some cases, use other markup to attain the desired effect (indent attribute was added to ). * -> It’s not always nec. to replicate the indentation in the original I-D. (editorial judgment) * See [[v3_when_to_use_indent_attribute]] (internal) - questions about postal address handling (April and July 2020) * –> template for mail when RPC can’t replicate the postal address provided by the author: "The discrepancy is due to xml2rfc now using a library to display addresses in a country-specific manner” * See [[format_of_addresses]] (internal) - locations where non-ASCII chars may appear (March 2020) * –> Besides and 's child elements and attributes, non-ASCII chars can appear in , , and . * See FAQ: [[https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/FAQ-xml2rfcv3.html#name-how-do-i-insert-non-ascii-c|How do I insert non-ASCII characters?]] - guidance on
    vs. &br; (Jan and May 2020) * –> use
    not &br; * –> use
    sparingly; there typically should be other markup to get the desired output. * See [[v3_when_to_use_br]] (internal) - OK to leave 's type empty? (Jan 2020) * –> yes. - What element should be used for equations or formulas? (Jan 2020) * –> - how to set type (Nov 2019) * –> all the we encounter is type=“ascii-art” (when it's not svg) and Henrik advised setting it explicitly. * –> “call-flow” and “hex-dump” should not be used, even if that’s what the artwork looks like. currently described as “not supported” in https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/xml2rfc-doc.html#section-2.6.7 * See [[v3_artwork_tips]] (internal) - guidance on nested lists (July 2019) * –> various examples; essentially, within
  • or
    , you must use around text that precedes a nested list. * See [[v3_examples#nested_lists]] (internal) - What is best practice for usage (as opposed to )? (Nov 2019) * See [[refcontent]] (internal) - What is best practice for