The errata system is a bespoke system with all the associated 
  quirks and there is no good reason why we couldn't re-define 
  errata so that they  are those things handled by some OSS s/w 
  that we pick.

===Complaints/Concerns===
  - It takes too much of an AD's or the ISE's time to read, review, and verify or reject errata.
  - "It's not a bug tracking system and each time someone fills a bogus errata it adds burden on protocol implementers."
  - Searching for serious errata when faced with an unprioritized list is hard.
    - Most individual errata are not actually important; the community needs to be able to quickly distinguish between what is and isn't important


===Tangential concerns - in scope?===
  - Desire for a system that acts as an idea-for-document-update repository