github_exp_9366
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
github_exp_9366 [2023/07/12 11:07] jmahoney created |
github_exp_9366 [2023/07/12 11:55] (current) jmahoney added details |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ====== GitHub AUTH48 experiment: RFC 9366 ====== | ====== GitHub AUTH48 experiment: RFC 9366 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| ==== High-Level Summary ==== | ==== High-Level Summary ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * Original repo: [[https:// | ||
| + | * Based on [[github_experiment_6|" | ||
| + | * Variance from the experiment design: | ||
| + | * Markdown rather than RFCXML | ||
| ==== Workflow ==== | ==== Workflow ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | See the [[https:// | ||
| ==== RPC Lessons Learned ==== | ==== RPC Lessons Learned ==== | ||
| + | * Need to improve documentation for which type of edit to make in which format. | ||
| + | * Need to add PR checklist to internal procedures. | ||
| + | * More communication required to let authors know the status of the document once the content has been approved (e.g., when the document is being converted to RFCXML) | ||
| + | |||
| ==== Author Feedback ==== | ==== Author Feedback ==== | ||
| + | * **Advantages: | ||
| + | * **Disadvantages: | ||
| + | * **Was communication clear and easy to follow?** Yes | ||
| + | * **Were there any aspects of communication that were challenging? | ||
| + | * **Were the issues appropriately " | ||
| + | * **Were the issue labels helpful (e.g., rfced, question, editor-ready)? | ||
| + | * **Did you find the process more efficient than the current email-based process?** Yes | ||
| + | |||
github_exp_9366.1689185269.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/07/12 11:07 by jmahoney
Page Tools
