<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>

<reference anchor='I-D.mizrahi-ippm-compact-alternate-marking'>
<front>
<title>Compact Alternate Marking Methods for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring</title>

<author initials='T' surname='Mizrahi' fullname='Tal Mizrahi'>
    <organization />
</author>

<author initials='C' surname='Arad' fullname='Carmi Arad'>
    <organization />
</author>

<author initials='G' surname='Fioccola' fullname='Giuseppe Fioccola'>
    <organization />
</author>

<author initials='M' surname='Cociglio' fullname='Mauro Cociglio'>
    <organization />
</author>

<author initials='M' surname='Chen' fullname='Mach Chen'>
    <organization />
</author>

<author initials='L' surname='Zheng' fullname='Lianshu Zheng'>
    <organization />
</author>

<author initials='G' surname='Mirsky' fullname='Gregory Mirsky'>
    <organization />
</author>

<date month='July' day='6' year='2019' />

<abstract><t>This memo introduces new alternate marking methods that require a compact overhead of either a single bit per packet, or zero bits per packet.  This memo also presents a summary of alternate marking methods, and discusses the tradeoffs among them.  The target audience of this document is network protocol designers; this document is intended to help protocol designers choose the best alternate marking method(s) based on the protocol's constraints and requirements.</t></abstract>

</front>

<seriesInfo name='Internet-Draft' value='draft-mizrahi-ippm-compact-alternate-marking-05' />
<format type='TXT'
        target='http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mizrahi-ippm-compact-alternate-marking-05.txt' />
</reference>
