<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rfc-editor-queue xmlns="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-editor-queue">
<section name="IETF STREAM: WORKING GROUP STANDARDS TRACK">
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location">
<draft>draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2022-03-07</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Rosen, R. Marshall, J. Martin</authors>
<title>
A LoST extension to return complete and similar location info
</title>
<bytes>39222</bytes>
<source>Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm">
<draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-29.txt</draft>
<date-received>2022-05-16</date-received>
<state>AUTH*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Kim, Ed., J. Jeong, Ed., J. Park, S. Hares, Q. Lin</authors>
<title>
I2NSF Network Security Function-Facing Interface YANG Data Model
</title>
<bytes>163771</bytes>
<source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model">
<draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32.txt</draft>
<date-received>2022-05-16</date-received>
<state>AUTH*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Hares, Ed., J. Jeong, Ed., J. Kim, R. Moskowitz, Q. Lin</authors>
<title>
I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model
</title>
<bytes>144719</bytes>
<source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model">
<draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20.txt</draft>
<date-received>2022-05-18</date-received>
<state>AUTH*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Jeong, P. Lingga, S. Hares, L. Xia, H. Birkholz</authors>
<title>
I2NSF NSF Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model
</title>
<bytes>198846</bytes>
<source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm">
<draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2023-05-10</date-received>
<state>AUTH*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Hyun, Ed., J. Jeong, Ed., T. Roh, S. Wi, J. Park</authors>
<title>
I2NSF Registration Interface YANG Data Model for NSF Capability Registration
</title>
<bytes>75991</bytes>
<source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http">
<draft>draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2023-05-17</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teep-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. Thaler</authors>
<title>
HTTP Transport for Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning: Agent Initiated Communication
</title>
<bytes>32377</bytes>
<source>Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm">
<draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-31.txt</draft>
<date-received>2023-06-21</date-received>
<state>AUTH*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Jeong, Ed., C. Chung, T. Ahn, R. Kumar, S. Hares</authors>
<title>
I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model
</title>
<bytes>148819</bytes>
<source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-acme-integrations">
<draft>draft-ietf-acme-integrations-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2023-07-14</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>O. Friel, R. Barnes, R. Shekh-Yusef, M. Richardson</authors>
<title>
ACME Integrations for Device Certificate Enrollment
</title>
<bytes>60561</bytes>
<source>Automated Certificate Management Environment</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2024-01-09</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9916</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. Dhody, S. Turner, R. Housley</authors>
<title>
Updates for PCEPS: TLS Connection Establishment Restrictions
</title>
<bytes>12769</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netconf-over-tls13">
<draft>draft-ietf-netconf-over-tls13-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2024-01-19</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9918</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Turner, R. Housley</authors>
<title>
Updates to Using the NETCONF Protocol over Transport Layer Security (TLS) with Mutual X.509 Authentication
</title>
<bytes>12530</bytes>
<source>Network Configuration</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2024-01-23</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Zhang, D. Dhody, K. Gao, R. Schott, Q. Ma</authors>
<title>
YANG Data Models for the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Protocol
</title>
<bytes>162150</bytes>
<source>Application-Layer Traffic Optimization</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types">
<draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2024-02-23</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Zheng, I. Busi</authors>
<title>
Common YANG Data Types for Layer 1 Networks
</title>
<bytes>104702</bytes>
<source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2024-04-12</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>Y. Lee, K. Lee, H. Zheng, O. Gonzalez de Dios, D. Ceccarelli</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for L1 Connectivity Service Model (L1CSM)
</title>
<bytes>34233</bytes>
<source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2024-09-13</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9919</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>T. Ito, C. Wilson, C. Bonnell, S. Turner</authors>
<title>
Updates to Lightweight OCSP Profile for High Volume Environments
</title>
<bytes>78402</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-jmap-calendars">
<draft>draft-ietf-jmap-calendars-22.txt</draft>
<date-received>2024-11-14</date-received>
<state>IESG</state>
<authors>N. Jenkins, Ed., M. Douglass, Ed.</authors>
<title>
JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Calendars
</title>
<bytes>122674</bytes>
<source>JSON Mail Access Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-20.txt</draft>
<date-received>2024-11-21</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Zheng, I. Busi, X. Liu, S. Belotti, O. Gonzalez de Dios</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for Optical Transport Network Topology
</title>
<bytes>189048</bytes>
<source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bier-php">
<draft>draft-ietf-bier-php-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2024-12-06</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bier-lsr-non-mpls-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bier-ospfv3-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>Z. Zhang</authors>
<title>
BIER Penultimate Hop Popping
</title>
<bytes>20564</bytes>
<source>Bit Indexed Explicit Replication</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher">
<draft>draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-01-16</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>T. Werner, M. Richardson</authors>
<title>
JWS signed Voucher Artifacts for Bootstrapping Protocols
</title>
<bytes>38945</bytes>
<source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-suit-manifest">
<draft>draft-ietf-suit-manifest-34.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-02-25</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*A*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-mti</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-report</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-update-management</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Moran, H. Tschofenig, H. Birkholz, K. Zandberg, Ø. Rønningstad</authors>
<title>
A Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)-based Serialization Format for the Software Updates for Internet of Things (SUIT) Manifest
</title>
<bytes>224760</bytes>
<source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-suit-mud">
<draft>draft-ietf-suit-mud-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-02-25</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Moran, H. Tschofenig</authors>
<title>
Strong Assertions of IoT Network Access Requirements
</title>
<bytes>24667</bytes>
<source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection">
<draft>draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-40.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-03-11</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9914</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-raw-architecture</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Thubert, Ed., R. Arvind Jadhav, M. Richardson</authors>
<title>
Root-initiated Routing State in RPL
</title>
<bytes>223311</bytes>
<source>Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn">
<draft>draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-34.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-03-17</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9768</auth48-url>
<authors>B. Briscoe, M. Kühlewind, R. Scheffenegger</authors>
<title>
More Accurate Explicit Congestion Notification (AccECN) Feedback in TCP
</title>
<bytes>189125</bytes>
<source>TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>yes</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting">
<draft>draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-32.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-03-18</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Brotman, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) Aggregate Reporting
</title>
<bytes>86645</bytes>
<source>Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting &amp; Conformance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis">
<draft>draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-41.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-03-18</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>T. Herr, Ed., J. Levine, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC)
</title>
<bytes>203581</bytes>
<source>Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting &amp; Conformance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-44.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-03-18</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-emailcore-as</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Klensin</authors>
<title>
Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
</title>
<bytes>309481</bytes>
<source>Revision of core Email specifications</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-03-18</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-emailcore-as</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Resnick, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Internet Message Format
</title>
<bytes>133284</bytes>
<source>Revision of core Email specifications</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption">
<draft>draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-04-21</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-mti</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Tschofenig, R. Housley, B. Moran, D. Brown, K. Takayama</authors>
<title>
Encrypted Payloads in SUIT Manifests
</title>
<bytes>109181</bytes>
<source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-05-12</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Wu, D. Dhody, R. Rokui, T. Saad, J. Mullooly</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for the RFC 9543 Network Slice Service
</title>
<bytes>251053</bytes>
<source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen">
<draft>draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-06-18</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9851</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Salz, N. Aviram</authors>
<title>
TLS 1.2 is in Feature Freeze
</title>
<bytes>11133</bytes>
<source>Transport Layer Security</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains">
<draft>draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-07-23</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Moran, K. Takayama</authors>
<title>
Software Update for the Internet of Things (SUIT) Manifest Extensions for Multiple Trust Domain
</title>
<bytes>77467</bytes>
<source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-suit-mti">
<draft>draft-ietf-suit-mti-23.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-07-23</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Moran, Ø. Rønningstad, A. Tsukamoto</authors>
<title>
Cryptographic Algorithms for Internet of Things (IoT) Devices
</title>
<bytes>37877</bytes>
<source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob">
<draft>draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-07-23</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9888</auth48-url>
<authors>J. Peterson</authors>
<title>
Out-of-Band STIR for Service Providers
</title>
<bytes>26575</bytes>
<source>Secure Telephone Identity Revisited</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-08-11</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9846</auth48-url>
<authors>E. Rescorla</authors>
<title>
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3
</title>
<bytes>368693</bytes>
<source>Transport Layer Security</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-radext-reverse-coa">
<draft>draft-ietf-radext-reverse-coa-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-08-28</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-radext-radiusdtls-bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. DeKok, V. Cargatser</authors>
<title>
Reverse Change-of-Authorization (CoA) in RADIUS/(D)TLS
</title>
<bytes>34805</bytes>
<source>RADIUS EXTensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update">
<draft>draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-03</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>N. Buraglio, T. Chown, J. Duncan</authors>
<title>
Prioritizing known-local IPv6 ULAs through address selection policy
</title>
<bytes>48732</bytes>
<source>IPv6 Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-scim-device-model">
<draft>draft-ietf-scim-device-model-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-04</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9944</auth48-url>
<authors>M. Shahzad, H. Iqbal, E. Lear</authors>
<title>
Device Schema Extensions to the SCIM model
</title>
<bytes>139621</bytes>
<source>System for Cross-domain Identity Management</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>yes</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tls-8773bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-tls-8773bis-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-04</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9973</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Housley</authors>
<title>
TLS 1.3 Extension for Using Certificates with an External Pre-Shared Key
</title>
<bytes>37725</bytes>
<source>Transport Layer Security</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud">
<draft>draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-10</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>O. Friel, R. Shekh-Yusef, M. Richardson</authors>
<title>
Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI) Cloud Registrar
</title>
<bytes>77574</bytes>
<source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs">
<draft>draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-10</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9942</auth48-url>
<authors>O. Steele, H. Birkholz, A. Delignat-Lavaud, C. Fournet</authors>
<title>
COSE (CBOR Object Signing and Encryption) Receipts
</title>
<bytes>43632</bytes>
<source>CBOR Object Signing and Encryption</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume">
<draft>draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume-24.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-17</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>N. Kuhn, E. Stephan, G. Fairhurst, R. Secchi, C. Huitema</authors>
<title>
Convergence of Congestion Control from Retained State
</title>
<bytes>89073</bytes>
<source>Transport and Services Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb">
<draft>draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-17</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9956</auth48-url>
<authors>G. White, T. Fossati, R. Geib</authors>
<title>
A Non-Queue-Building Per-Hop Behavior (NQB PHB) for Differentiated Services
</title>
<bytes>110062</bytes>
<source>Transport and Services Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol">
<draft>draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-18</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9946</auth48-url>
<authors>A. Morton, L. Ciavattone, R. Geib, Ed.</authors>
<title>
UDP Speed Test Protocol for One-way IP Capacity Metric Measurement
</title>
<bytes>158137</bytes>
<source>IP Performance Measurement</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping">
<draft>draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-24</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Bidgoli, Ed., Z. Ali, Z. Zhang, A. Budhiraja, D. Voyer</authors>
<title>
Segment Routing MPLS Point-to-Multipoint (P2MP) Policy Ping
</title>
<bytes>26005</bytes>
<source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy">
<draft>draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-22.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-24</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>R. Parekh, Ed., D. Voyer, Ed., C. Filsfils, H. Bidgoli, Z. Zhang</authors>
<title>
Segment Routing Point-to-Multipoint Policy
</title>
<bytes>59203</bytes>
<source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa">
<draft>draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>A. DeKok</authors>
<title>
The eap.arpa. domain and EAP provisioning
</title>
<bytes>58309</bytes>
<source>EAP Method Update</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls">
<draft>draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-01</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>O. Friel, D. Harkins</authors>
<title>
Bootstrapped TLS Authentication with Proof of Knowledge (TLS-POK)
</title>
<bytes>34463</bytes>
<source>EAP Method Update</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-scitt-architecture">
<draft>draft-ietf-scitt-architecture-22.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-01</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9943</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>H. Birkholz, A. Delignat-Lavaud, C. Fournet, Y. Deshpande, S. Lasker</authors>
<title>
An Architecture for Trustworthy and Transparent Digital Supply Chains
</title>
<bytes>87900</bytes>
<source>Supply Chain Integrity, Transparency, and Trust</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry">
<draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-23.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-01</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9951</auth48-url>
<authors>T. Graf, B. Claise, A. Huang-Feng</authors>
<title>
Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX)
</title>
<bytes>68779</bytes>
<source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-cose-dilithium">
<draft>draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-15</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>M. Prorock, O. Steele</authors>
<title>
ML-DSA for JOSE and COSE
</title>
<bytes>183565</bytes>
<source>CBOR Object Signing and Encryption</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-29.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-17</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9933</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Sidor, Z. Rose, S. Peng, S. Peng, A. Stone</authors>
<title>
Carrying SR-Algorithm in Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
</title>
<bytes>73983</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-20</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Belotti, Ed., I. Busi, Ed., D. Beller, Ed., E. Le Rouzic, A. Guo</authors>
<title>
Common YANG Data Types for Layer 0 Optical Networks
</title>
<bytes>150305</bytes>
<source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-scim-events">
<draft>draft-ietf-scim-events-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-21</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>P. Hunt, Ed., N. Cam-Winget, M. Kiser, J. Schreiber</authors>
<title>
SCIM Profile for Security Event Tokens
</title>
<bytes>74002</bytes>
<source>System for Cross-domain Identity Management</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope">
<draft>draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-27</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>O. Steele, S. Lasker, H. Birkholz</authors>
<title>
COSE Hash Envelope
</title>
<bytes>23641</bytes>
<source>CBOR Object Signing and Encryption</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update">
<draft>draft-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-31</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>J. Peterson, C. Wendt</authors>
<title>
Connected Identity for STIR
</title>
<bytes>40027</bytes>
<source>Secure Telephone Identity Revisited</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-core-href">
<draft>draft-ietf-core-href-30.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-06</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>C. Bormann, Ed., H. Birkholz</authors>
<title>
Constrained Resource Identifiers
</title>
<bytes>143025</bytes>
<source>Constrained RESTful Environments</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server">
<draft>draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-41.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>K. Watsen</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for NETCONF Clients and Servers
</title>
<bytes>128054</bytes>
<source>Network Configuration</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server">
<draft>draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-45.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>K. Watsen</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for RESTCONF Clients and Servers
</title>
<bytes>124544</bytes>
<source>Network Configuration</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server">
<draft>draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-33.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>K. Watsen</authors>
<title>
YANG Groupings for HTTP Clients and HTTP Servers
</title>
<bytes>93323</bytes>
<source>Network Configuration</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ntp-over-ptp">
<draft>draft-ietf-ntp-over-ptp-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-17</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>M. Lichvar</authors>
<title>
NTP Over PTP
</title>
<bytes>31236</bytes>
<source>Network Time Protocols</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body">
<draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-20</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>J. Reschke, J. Snell, M. Bishop</authors>
<title>
The HTTP QUERY Method
</title>
<bytes>61538</bytes>
<source>HTTP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-22.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-02</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>S. Bingler, Ed., M. West, Ed., J. Wilander, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Cookies: HTTP State Management Mechanism
</title>
<bytes>138768</bytes>
<source>HTTP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tls-tls13-pkcs1">
<draft>draft-ietf-tls-tls13-pkcs1-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-02</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9963</auth48-url>
<authors>D. Benjamin, A. Popov</authors>
<title>
Legacy RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 codepoints for TLS 1.3
</title>
<bytes>14155</bytes>
<source>Transport Layer Security</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap">
<draft>draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap-23.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-08</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>H. Birkholz, N. Smith, T. Fossati, H. Tschofenig, D. Glaze</authors>
<title>
RATS Conceptual Messages Wrapper (CMW)
</title>
<bytes>83745</bytes>
<source>Remote ATtestation ProcedureS</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-suit-report">
<draft>draft-ietf-suit-report-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-09</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-mti</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Moran, H. Birkholz</authors>
<title>
Secure Reporting of SUIT Update Status
</title>
<bytes>66664</bytes>
<source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats">
<draft>draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>M. Srivastava, Ed., Y. Liu, C. Lin, Ed., J. Li</authors>
<title>
Advanced BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) Statistics Types
</title>
<bytes>38507</bytes>
<source>Global Routing Operations</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dnsop-cds-consistency">
<draft>draft-ietf-dnsop-cds-consistency-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-11</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>P. Thomassen</authors>
<title>
Clarifications on CDS/CDNSKEY and CSYNC Consistency
</title>
<bytes>35060</bytes>
<source>Domain Name System Operations</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths">
<draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-16</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>O. Gasser, R. Bush, M. Candela, R. Housley</authors>
<title>
Publishing End-Site Prefix Lengths
</title>
<bytes>71832</bytes>
<source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server">
<draft>draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-19</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>A. Huang-Feng, P. Francois, K. Watsen</authors>
<title>
YANG Groupings for UDP Clients and UDP Servers
</title>
<bytes>28219</bytes>
<source>Network Configuration</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth">
<draft>draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth-24.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-22</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>P. Mohapatra, R. Das, Ed., S. Mohanty, Ed., S. Krier, R. Szarecki, A. Gattani</authors>
<title>
BGP Link Bandwidth Extended Community
</title>
<bytes>24585</bytes>
<source>Inter-Domain Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-reflection">
<draft>draft-ietf-6man-icmpv6-reflection-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-29</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>T. Mizrahi, X. He, T. Zhou, R. Bonica, X. Min</authors>
<title>
Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) Reflection
</title>
<bytes>31307</bytes>
<source>IPv6 Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer">
<draft>draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-41.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-05</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>K. Inamdar, S. Narayanan, C. Jennings</authors>
<title>
Automatic Peering for SIP Trunks
</title>
<bytes>131812</bytes>
<source>Automatic SIP trunking And Peering</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc">
<draft>draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-06</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>S. Kousidis, J. Roth, F. Strenzke, A. Wussler</authors>
<title>
Post-Quantum Cryptography in OpenPGP
</title>
<bytes>846088</bytes>
<source>Open Specification for Pretty Good Privacy</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tls-deprecate-obsolete-kex">
<draft>draft-ietf-tls-deprecate-obsolete-kex-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-06</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>N. Aviram</authors>
<title>
Deprecating Obsolete Key Exchange Methods in (D)TLS 1.2
</title>
<bytes>65698</bytes>
<source>Transport Layer Security</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-keyusage-crl-validation">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-keyusage-crl-validation-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-07</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>C. Bonnell, T. Ito, T. Okubo</authors>
<title>
Clarification to Processing Key Usage Values During Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Validation
</title>
<bytes>13364</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rift-kv-tie-structure-and-processing">
<draft>draft-ietf-rift-kv-tie-structure-and-processing-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-07</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>J. Head, Ed., T. Przygienda</authors>
<title>
Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT) Key/Value Topology Information Elements Structure and Processing
</title>
<bytes>26966</bytes>
<source>Routing In Fat Trees</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting">
<draft>draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-24.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT*A*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Jones, A. Vesely</authors>
<title>
Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) Failure Reporting
</title>
<bytes>41606</bytes>
<source>Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting &amp; Conformance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-uid">
<draft>draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-uid-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>R. Stepanek</authors>
<title>
JSContact Version 2.0: A JSON Representation of Contact Data
</title>
<bytes>14103</bytes>
<source>Calendaring Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-sidrops-manifest-numbers">
<draft>draft-ietf-sidrops-manifest-numbers-09.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-13</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>T. Harrison, G. Michaelson, J. Snijders</authors>
<title>
Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Manifest Number Handling
</title>
<bytes>20714</bytes>
<source>SIDR Operations</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-haptics">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-haptics-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-20</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>H. Yang, X. Foy</authors>
<title>
RTP Payload Format for Haptics
</title>
<bytes>57840</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen">
<draft>draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-06.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-22</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>C. Bormann</authors>
<title>
YANG-CBOR: Allocating SID ranges for PEN holders
</title>
<bytes>16996</bytes>
<source>Constrained RESTful Environments</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lsr-anycast-flag">
<draft>draft-ietf-lsr-anycast-flag-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>R. Chen, D. Zhao, P. Psenak, K. Talaulikar, C. Lin</authors>
<title>
OSPFv2 Anycast Property Advertisement
</title>
<bytes>23501</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp">
<draft>draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Parekh, Ed., D. Voyer, Ed., C. Filsfils, H. Bidgoli, Z. Zhang</authors>
<title>
Multicast and Ethernet VPN with Segment Routing P2MP and Ingress Replication
</title>
<bytes>62281</bytes>
<source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netmod-system-config">
<draft>draft-ietf-netmod-system-config-20.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>Q. Ma, Ed., Q. Wu, C. Feng</authors>
<title>
System-defined Configuration
</title>
<bytes>60570</bytes>
<source>Network Modeling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-03</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>E. Dijk, M. Tiloca</authors>
<title>
Group Communication for the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
</title>
<bytes>284853</bytes>
<source>Constrained RESTful Environments</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm">
<draft>draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm-28.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-03</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Tiloca, G. Selander, F. Palombini, J. Preuß Mattsson, R. Höglund</authors>
<title>
Group Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (Group OSCORE)
</title>
<bytes>306102</bytes>
<source>Constrained RESTful Environments</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem">
<draft>draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-11</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>K. Kwiatkowski, P. Kampanakis, B. Westerbaan, D. Stebila</authors>
<title>
Post-quantum hybrid ECDHE-MLKEM Key Agreement for TLSv1.3
</title>
<bytes>24665</bytes>
<source>Transport Layer Security</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5273bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5273bis-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5272bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Mandel, S. Turner, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Certificate Management over CMS (CMC): Transport Protocols
</title>
<bytes>27909</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5274bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5274bis-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5272bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5273bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Mandel, S. Turner</authors>
<title>
Certificate Management Messages over CMS (CMC): Compliance Requirements
</title>
<bytes>31083</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5272bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5272bis-11.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>J. Mandel, Ed., S. Turner, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Certificate Management over CMS (CMC)
</title>
<bytes>226291</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rats-eat-measured-component">
<draft>draft-ietf-rats-eat-measured-component-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-20</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>S. Frost, T. Fossati, H. Tschofenig, H. Birkholz</authors>
<title>
Entity Attestation Token (EAT) Measured Component
</title>
<bytes>40511</bytes>
<source>Remote ATtestation ProcedureS</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-sshm-ssh-agent">
<draft>draft-ietf-sshm-ssh-agent-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-20</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>D. Miller</authors>
<title>
SSH Agent Protocol
</title>
<bytes>71960</bytes>
<source>Secure Shell Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mailmaint-imap-uidbatches">
<draft>draft-ietf-mailmaint-imap-uidbatches-22.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-20</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>D. Eggert, Ed.</authors>
<title>
IMAP UIDBATCHES Extension
</title>
<bytes>35961</bytes>
<source>Mail Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr">
<draft>draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr-21.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-26</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>J. Rajamanickam, Ed., R. Gandhi, Ed., R. Zigler, H. Song, K. Kompella</authors>
<title>
MPLS Network Action (MNA) Sub-Stack Specification including In-Stack Network Actions and Data
</title>
<bytes>74053</bytes>
<source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes">
<draft>draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-27</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>R. Bellis</authors>
<title>
DNS Multiple QTYPEs
</title>
<bytes>25890</bytes>
<source>Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ohai-chunked-ohttp">
<draft>draft-ietf-ohai-chunked-ohttp-08.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-27</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-httpbis-incremental</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>T. Pauly, M. Thomson</authors>
<title>
Chunked Oblivious HTTP Messages
</title>
<bytes>38879</bytes>
<source>Oblivious HTTP Application Intermediation</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c">
<draft>draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-27</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>L. Ilola, L. Kondrad</authors>
<title>
RTP Payload Format for Visual Volumetric Video-based Coding (V3C)
</title>
<bytes>115143</bytes>
<source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby">
<draft>draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-02</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>Z. Lin, B. Claise, I. Martinez-Casanueva</authors>
<title>
Augmented-by Addition to the YANG Library
</title>
<bytes>55551</bytes>
<source>Network Configuration</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpbis-incremental">
<draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-incremental-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-02</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>K. Oku, T. Pauly, M. Thomson</authors>
<title>
Incremental Forwarding of HTTP Messages
</title>
<bytes>16761</bytes>
<source>HTTP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-v6ops-claton">
<draft>draft-ietf-v6ops-claton-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-06</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>L. Colitti, J. Linkova, T. Jensen</authors>
<title>
464XLAT Customer-side Translator (CLAT): Node Behavior and Recommendations
</title>
<bytes>60097</bytes>
<source>IPv6 Operations</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dhcp">
<draft>draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dhcp-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-06</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>W. Cheng, Ed., R. Han, C. Lin, Ed., D. Voyer, G. Zhang</authors>
<title>
Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP
</title>
<bytes>49946</bytes>
<source>Source Packet Routing in Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-teep-protocol">
<draft>draft-ietf-teep-protocol-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-06</date-received>
<state>AUTH</state>
<authors>H. Tschofenig, M. Pei, D. Wheeler, D. Thaler, A. Tsukamoto</authors>
<title>
Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning (TEEP) Protocol
</title>
<bytes>194741</bytes>
<source>Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-09</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-multipath</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Li, Ed., M. Chen, W. Cheng, R. Gandhi, Ed., Q. Xiong</authors>
<title>
Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Segment Routing (SR) LSPs
</title>
<bytes>36019</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking">
<draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-09</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>J. Rabadan, Ed., A. Sajassi, Ed., E. Rosen, J. Drake, W. Lin, J. Uttaro, A. Simpson</authors>
<title>
Interconnecting EVPN and IPVPN Domains
</title>
<bytes>93671</bytes>
<source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-updt-ipv6-dyn-mcast-addr-grp-id">
<draft>draft-ietf-pim-updt-ipv6-dyn-mcast-addr-grp-id-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-11</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>N. Karstens, D. Farinacci, M. McBride</authors>
<title>
Updates to Dynamic IPv6 Multicast Address Group IDs
</title>
<bytes>16378</bytes>
<source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ace-oscore-gm-admin">
<draft>draft-ietf-ace-oscore-gm-admin-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-oscore</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Tiloca, R. Höglund, P. van der Stok, F. Palombini</authors>
<title>
Admin Interface for the OSCORE Group Manager
</title>
<bytes>208319</bytes>
<source>Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on">
<draft>draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-13</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>R. Housley, C. Bonnell, J. Mandel, T. Okubo, M. StJohns</authors>
<title>
Media Access Control (MAC) Addresses in X.509 Certificates
</title>
<bytes>31764</bytes>
<source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-ls-link-infinity">
<draft>draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-ls-link-infinity-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-15</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>L. Gong, W. Cheng, C. Lin, A. Lindem, R. Chen</authors>
<title>
Advertising Unreachable Links in OSPF
</title>
<bytes>59385</bytes>
<source>Link State Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb">
<draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-35.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-15</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>N. Malhotra, Ed., A. Sajassi, J. Rabadan, J. Drake, A. Lingala, S. Thoria</authors>
<title>
Weighted Multi-Path Procedures for EVPN Multi-Homing
</title>
<bytes>56262</bytes>
<source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang">
<draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-23.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-15</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. Beller, Ed., E. Le Rouzic, S. Belotti, G. Galimberti, I. Busi</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for Optical Impairment-aware Topology
</title>
<bytes>337564</bytes>
<source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions">
<draft>draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-16</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>S. Sidor, P. Maheshwari, A. Stone, L. Jalil, S. Peng</authors>
<title>
Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions for Circuit Style Policies
</title>
<bytes>38907</bytes>
<source>Path Computation Element</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-oscore">
<draft>draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-oscore-21.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-16</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-core-oscore-groupcomm</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Tiloca, F. Palombini</authors>
<title>
Key Management for Group Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (Group OSCORE) Using Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE)
</title>
<bytes>290029</bytes>
<source>Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-calext-ical-tasks">
<draft>draft-ietf-calext-ical-tasks-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-16</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>A. Apthorp, M. Douglass</authors>
<title>
Task Extensions to iCalendar
</title>
<bytes>72569</bytes>
<source>Calendaring Extensions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts">
<draft>draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-17</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>G. Mirsky, E. Ruffini, H. Nydell, R. Foote, W. Hawkins</authors>
<title>
Performance Measurement with Asymmetrical Traffic Using Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP)
</title>
<bytes>48875</bytes>
<source>IP Performance Measurement</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-quic-multipath">
<draft>draft-ietf-quic-multipath-21.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-18</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>Y. Liu, Ed., Y. Ma, Q. De Coninck, Ed., O. Bonaventure, C. Huitema, M. Kühlewind, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Managing multiple paths for a QUIC connection
</title>
<bytes>99176</bytes>
<source>QUIC</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-teas-yang-te">
<draft>draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-44.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-30</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>T. Saad, R. Gandhi, X. Liu, V. Pavan Beeram, I. Bryskin</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering Tunnels, Label Switched Paths, and Interfaces
</title>
<bytes>231160</bytes>
<source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl">
<draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-04-03</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>Q. Ma, Ed., Q. Wu, M. Boucadair, Ed., D. King</authors>
<title>
A YANG Data Model and RADIUS Extension for Policy-Based Network Access Control
</title>
<bytes>89865</bytes>
<source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="IETF STREAM: NON-WORKING GROUP STANDARDS TRACK">
</section>
<section name="IETF STREAM: WORKING GROUP INFORMATIONAL/EXPERIMENTAL/BCP">
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability">
<draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2019-12-16</date-received>
<state>REF*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>J. Jeong, S. Hyun, T. Ahn, S. Hares, D. Lopez</authors>
<title>
Applicability of Interfaces to Network Security Functions to Network-Based Security Services
</title>
<bytes>69045</bytes>
<source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing">
<draft>draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2024-08-28</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-yang-te</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. King, J. Drake, H. Zheng, A. Farrel</authors>
<title>
Applicability of Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN) to IETF Network Slicing
</title>
<bytes>54774</bytes>
<source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-raw-technologies">
<draft>draft-ietf-raw-technologies-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-04-22</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9913</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-raw-architecture</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Thubert, Ed., D. Cavalcanti, X. Vilajosana, C. Schmitt, J. Farkas</authors>
<title>
Reliable and Available Wireless (RAW) Technologies
</title>
<bytes>162119</bytes>
<source>Deterministic Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>yes</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile">
<draft>draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile-05.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-06-11</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9850</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>M. Thomson, Y. Rosomakho, H. Tschofenig</authors>
<title>
The SSLKEYLOGFILE Format for TLS
</title>
<bytes>33645</bytes>
<source>Transport Layer Security</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13">
<draft>draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-12.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-06-25</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9852</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>R. Salz, N. Aviram</authors>
<title>
New Protocols Using TLS Must Require TLS 1.3
</title>
<bytes>18562</bytes>
<source>Using TLS in Applications</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-oauth-browser-based-apps">
<draft>draft-ietf-oauth-browser-based-apps-26.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-07-08</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. Parecki, P. Ryck, D. Waite</authors>
<title>
OAuth 2.0 for Browser-Based Applications
</title>
<bytes>157766</bytes>
<source>Web Authorization Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-raw-architecture">
<draft>draft-ietf-raw-architecture-30.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-07-28</date-received>
<state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9912</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-raw-technologies</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>P. Thubert</authors>
<title>
Reliable and Available Wireless (RAW) Architecture
</title>
<bytes>109400</bytes>
<source>Deterministic Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers">
<draft>draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-09</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>A. Banerjee, T. Reddy, D. Schoinianakis, T. Hollebeek, M. Ounsworth</authors>
<title>
Post-Quantum Cryptography for Engineers
</title>
<bytes>129395</bytes>
<source>Post-Quantum Use In Protocols</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pquip-hybrid-signature-spectrums">
<draft>draft-ietf-pquip-hybrid-signature-spectrums-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-09</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9955</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>N. Bindel, B. Hale, D. Connolly, F. Driscoll</authors>
<title>
Hybrid signature spectrums
</title>
<bytes>74770</bytes>
<source>Post-Quantum Use In Protocols</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design">
<draft>draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-16.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-09-17</date-received>
<state>AUTH48</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9954</auth48-url>
<authors>D. Stebila, S. Fluhrer, S. Gueron</authors>
<title>
Hybrid key exchange in TLS 1.3
</title>
<bytes>52657</bytes>
<source>Transport Layer Security</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt">
<draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-20</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Xie, C. Li, J. Dong, Z. Li</authors>
<title>
Applicability of Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) with Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partitions (NRPs)
</title>
<bytes>23523</bytes>
<source>Inter-Domain Routing</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bmwg-mlrsearch">
<draft>draft-ietf-bmwg-mlrsearch-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-05</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>M. Konstantynowicz, V. Polák</authors>
<title>
Multiple Loss Ratio Search
</title>
<bytes>174265</bytes>
<source>Benchmarking Methodology</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers-27.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT*R</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>A. DeKok, M. Jethanandani, S. Agarwal, A. Mishra, J. Haas</authors>
<title>
Meticulous Keyed ISAAC for BFD Optimized Authentication
</title>
<bytes>77770</bytes>
<source>Bidirectional Forwarding Detection</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfd-stability">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfd-stability-21.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-12</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>A. Mishra, M. Jethanandani, A. Saxena, S. Pallagatti, M. Chen</authors>
<title>
BFD Stability
</title>
<bytes>44913</bytes>
<source>Bidirectional Forwarding Detection</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication">
<draft>draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-36.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-12</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>M. Jethanandani, A. Mishra, J. Haas, A. Saxena, M. Bhatia</authors>
<title>
Optimizing BFD Authentication
</title>
<bytes>52149</bytes>
<source>Bidirectional Forwarding Detection</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dispatch-mime-protobuf">
<draft>draft-ietf-dispatch-mime-protobuf-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-20</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>M. Kucherawy, Ed., W. Kumari, R. Sloan</authors>
<title>
Media Type Registration for Protocol Buffers
</title>
<bytes>20603</bytes>
<source>Dispatch</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements">
<draft>draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements-21.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-03</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>G. Mirsky, Ed., N. Kumar, M. Chen, S. Pallagatti, Ed.</authors>
<title>
Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Requirements for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Layer
</title>
<bytes>19838</bytes>
<source>Bit Indexed Explicit Replication</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mailmaint-messageflag-mailboxattribute">
<draft>draft-ietf-mailmaint-messageflag-mailboxattribute-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-12-18</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>N. Jenkins, D. Eggert</authors>
<title>
Registration of further IMAP/JMAP keywords and mailbox name attributes
</title>
<bytes>49979</bytes>
<source>Mail Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization">
<draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-28</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>C. Pignataro, A. Farrel, T. Mizrahi</authors>
<title>
Guidelines for Characterizing the Term "OAM"
</title>
<bytes>29312</bytes>
<source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements">
<draft>draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-01-28</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>K. Yao, L. Contreras, H. Shi, S. Zhang, Q. An</authors>
<title>
Computing-Aware Traffic Steering (CATS) Problem Statement, Use Cases, and Requirements
</title>
<bytes>83733</bytes>
<source>Computing-Aware Traffic Steering</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis">
<draft>draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-13</date-received>
<state>EDIT*A</state>
<authors>M. Yamamoto, T. Fiebig</authors>
<title>
Operational Guidelines for DNS Transport in Mixed IPv4/IPv6 Environments
</title>
<bytes>47427</bytes>
<source>Domain Name System Operations</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lisp-te">
<draft>draft-ietf-lisp-te-25.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-17</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8378bis</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>D. Farinacci, M. Kowal, P. Lahiri, P. Pillay-Esnault, Ed.</authors>
<title>
LISP Traffic Engineering
</title>
<bytes>54443</bytes>
<source>Locator/ID Separation Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-sshm-mlkem-hybrid-kex">
<draft>draft-ietf-sshm-mlkem-hybrid-kex-10.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-24</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>P. Kampanakis, D. Stebila, T. Hansen</authors>
<title>
PQ/T Hybrid Key Exchange with ML-KEM in SSH
</title>
<bytes>35460</bytes>
<source>Secure Shell Maintenance</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-oauth-cross-device-security">
<draft>draft-ietf-oauth-cross-device-security-15.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-24</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>P. Kasselman, D. Fett, F. Skokan</authors>
<title>
Cross-Device Flows: Security Best Current Practice
</title>
<bytes>165226</bytes>
<source>Web Authorization Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps">
<draft>draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps-13.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-24</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>N. Karstens, D. Farinacci, M. McBride</authors>
<title>
Zeroconf Multicast Address Allocation Problem Statement and Requirements
</title>
<bytes>24548</bytes>
<source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pquip-hbs-state">
<draft>draft-ietf-pquip-hbs-state-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-03</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>T. Wiggers, K. Bashiri, S. Kölbl, J. Goodman, S. Kousidis</authors>
<title>
Hash-based Signatures: State and Backup Management
</title>
<bytes>60912</bytes>
<source>Post-Quantum Use In Protocols</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy">
<draft>draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy-17.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-12</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-multipath</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-srv6</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. Schmutzer, Ed., Z. Ali, Ed., P. Maheshwari, R. Rokui, A. Stone</authors>
<title>
Circuit Style Segment Routing Policy
</title>
<bytes>61965</bytes>
<source>Source Packet Routing in Networking</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lisp-geo">
<draft>draft-ietf-lisp-geo-20.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-15</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>D. Farinacci</authors>
<title>
LISP Geo-Coordinates
</title>
<bytes>37178</bytes>
<source>Locator/ID Separation Protocol</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ntp-roughtime">
<draft>draft-ietf-ntp-roughtime-19.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-17</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>W. Ladd, M. Dansarie</authors>
<title>
Roughtime
</title>
<bytes>73173</bytes>
<source>Network Time Protocols</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype">
<draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-04-03</date-received>
<state>EDIT*A</state>
<authors>G. Harris, Ed., M. Richardson</authors>
<title>
Link-Layer Types for PCAP-related Capture File Formats
</title>
<bytes>64045</bytes>
<source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="IETF STREAM: NON-WORKING GROUP INFORMATIONAL/EXPERIMENTAL/BCP">
<entry xml:id="draft-davids-forsalereg">
<draft>draft-davids-forsalereg-21.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-02-05</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>M. Davids</authors>
<title>
The "_for-sale" Underscored and Globally Scoped DNS Node Name
</title>
<bytes>45620</bytes>
<source>IETF - NON WORKING GROUP</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="IAB STREAM">
<entry xml:id="draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report">
<draft>draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-04.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-03</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>W. Hardaker, D. Dhody</authors>
<title>
Report from the IAB Workshop on the Next Era of Network Management Operations (NEMOPS)
</title>
<bytes>58821</bytes>
<source>IAB</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-iab-ai-control-report">
<draft>draft-iab-ai-control-report-02.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-11-03</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>M. Nottingham, S. Krishnan</authors>
<title>
IAB AI-CONTROL Workshop Report
</title>
<bytes>26959</bytes>
<source>IAB</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="IRTF STREAM">
<entry xml:id="draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead">
<draft>draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead-18.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-03-02</date-received>
<state>EDIT</state>
<authors>F. Denis, S. Lucas</authors>
<title>
The AEGIS Family of Authenticated Encryption Algorithms
</title>
<bytes>101650</bytes>
<source>Crypto Forum Research Group</source>
<consensus>yes</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
<section name="INDEPENDENT SUBMISSIONS">
<entry xml:id="draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection">
<draft>draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07.txt</draft>
<date-received>2022-05-11</date-received>
<state>AUTH48*R</state>
<auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9957</auth48-url>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb</ref-name>
<ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>B. Briscoe, Ed., G. White</authors>
<title>
The DOCSIS(r) Queue Protection Algorithm to Preserve Low Latency
</title>
<bytes>73799</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
<awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-farinacci-lisp-decent">
<draft>draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-22.txt</draft>
<date-received>2025-10-03</date-received>
<state>RFC-EDITOR</state>
<authors>D. Farinacci, C. Cantrell</authors>
<title>
A Decent LISP Mapping System (LISP-Decent)
</title>
<bytes>42683</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
<entry xml:id="draft-dekater-scion-dataplane">
<draft>draft-dekater-scion-dataplane-14.txt</draft>
<date-received>2026-04-07</date-received>
<state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-dekater-scion-controlplane</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<normRef>
<ref-name>draft-dekater-scion-pki</ref-name>
<ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state>
</normRef>
<authors>C. de Kater, N. Rustignoli, J. C. Hugly, S. Hitz</authors>
<title>
SCION Data Plane
</title>
<bytes>157531</bytes>
<source>INDEPENDENT</source>
<consensus>N/A</consensus>
</entry>
</section>
</rfc-editor-queue>
