[rfc-i] Is v3 ready?

Carsten Bormann cabo at tzi.org
Sun Jun 27 09:00:32 PDT 2021

On 2021-06-27, at 17:56, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> PS: FWIW, unless I'm missing something your output only has the @align
> defaults added, right?

Yes, and I am surprised that is different from your output.

I used xml2rfc 3.8.0.

3.9.1 gives:

      <table align="left" anchor="table_other_codes">
            <th align="left">Description</th>
            <th align="left">FSW Characters</th>
            <th align="left">SWU Characters</th>
            <td align="left">Sequence Marker</td>
            <td align="left">A</td>
            <td align="left">U+1D800</td>
            <td align="left">Signbox Markers</td>
            <td align="left">B, L, M, R</td>
            <td align="left">U+1D801 to U+1D804</td>
            <td align="left">Numbers</td>
            <td align="left">250 to 749</td>
            <td align="left">U+1D80C to U+1D9FF</td>
            <td align="left">Symbols</td>
            <td align="left">S10000 to S38b07</td>
            <td align="left">U+40001 to U+4F428</td>

Which I think is the same.

Grüße, Carsten

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list