[rfc-i] Changes to the v3 <postal> element

Eric Rescorla ekr at rtfm.com
Thu Jun 10 20:27:39 PDT 2021


On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 8:16 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot at mnot.net> wrote:

>
> > On 11 Jun 2021, at 1:13 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > Strictly speaking, <email> is optional as well. We may want to require
> it.
>
> Some authors don't wish to make their e-mail address available in the
> specification. Whether or not that's reasonable is debatable -- but again,
> this seems like it's out of scope for an effort to merely clean up 7991.
> Substantive changes should wait until we have a community-driven process in
> place.
>

+1

Unless there's some technical reason why we should need to require email,
this should be out of scope....

-Ekr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20210610/aae05248/attachment.html>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list