[rfc-i] Removing postal information from RFCs [was: Changes to the v3 <postal> element]

Mark Nottingham mnot at mnot.net
Thu Jun 10 19:59:58 PDT 2021



> On 11 Jun 2021, at 12:59 pm, John R Levine <johnl at taugh.com> wrote:
> 
>>> About what?  If there is evidence that the postal addresses are useful, I'd be happy to hear about it.  All we've seen is along the lines of well, someone might use it for X, but in practice they don't.
>> 
>> You claimed that lack of evidence was justification for this change. I was asking if that was informed lack of evidence, or just lack of asking.
> 
> I'm asking.  If anyone thinks that the physical postal address is important

I do.


> and worth the editors spending time on, let us know.

Given that we're already spending time on it, I think we've crossed that bridge.


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list