[rfc-i] Removing postal information from RFCs [was: Changes to the v3 <postal> element]

John R Levine johnl at taugh.com
Thu Jun 10 19:59:00 PDT 2021


>> About what?  If there is evidence that the postal addresses are useful, I'd be happy to hear about it.  All we've seen is along the lines of well, someone might use it for X, but in practice they don't.
>
> You claimed that lack of evidence was justification for this change. I was asking if that was informed lack of evidence, or just lack of asking.

I'm asking.  If anyone thinks that the physical postal address is 
important and worth the editors spending time on, let us know.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl at taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list