[rfc-i] I need your "good" RFCs

Wes Hardaker wjhns1 at hardakers.net
Fri Feb 12 09:42:51 PST 2021


Ted Lemon <mellon at fugue.com> writes:

> RFC7230 and friends, and RFC7540/1. Very readable and
> understandable. ISTR the FTP spec and the SMTP spec were very good as
> well, but haven’t looked at them in a long time.

Thanks.  I have always thought the IMAP spec was very readable too, for
that matter.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list