[rfc-i] I need your "good" RFCs

Wes Hardaker wjhns1 at hardakers.net
Fri Feb 12 09:38:31 PST 2021


"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis at gmail.com> writes:

> If "interoperable implementations" is an indicator, then it's hard to beat RFC
> 826, which must have many many thousands, if not millions, of independent
> implementations by now.

Ha, that's a very good point!  Thank you.

I assume that must mean it's readable and understandable then too.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list