[rfc-i] What the text version is used for (was Re: The <tt> train wreck)

Lars Eggert lars at eggert.org
Thu Aug 26 03:58:07 PDT 2021

On 2021-8-25, at 21:59, Robert Sparks <rjsparks at nostrum.com> wrote:
> I remember EKR mentioning that he used the plain text version when doing reviews, as it loaded well into the code-review tool he was co-opting.
> Are other people using the text this way?

I do.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20210826/3184b65b/attachment.asc>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list