[rfc-i] XInclude usage

John Levine johnl at taugh.com
Thu Aug 5 17:21:59 PDT 2021


It appears that Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at mozilla.com> said:
>On 8/4/21 6:02 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> It seems to me that we really need two schema:
>> 
>> 1) what the RPC accepts as input
>> 
>> 2) what the RPC publishes as an RFC
>> 
>> ... because they are getting more different, and trying to accommodate both in a single schema confuses people who want to know what (1)
>and (2) are definitively.
>
>This an interesting suggestion but personally I need to think about it
>before commenting further. :-)

There is the prepped vs. unprepped difference, but it's all the same schema.

The RPC will accept v2 but they immediately run it through the mechanical v2v3 converter
so they're only accepting it in the sense they'll accept an unformatted text draft, too.

R's,
John


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list