[rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

Stephen Farrell stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Wed Mar 25 17:56:13 PDT 2020


On 25/03/2020 23:00, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> To me, this is further evidence that a linearly-numbered series of
> archival documents as the primary source of truth is damaging.
FWIW, I'm unconvinced. And skeptical.

But, if that were worth discussing, it'd challenge a
very fundamental tenet of the RFC series, and would
surely therefore be worth at least it's own thread
where you or someone would collate and present your
evidence in some detail?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 10715 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20200326/1d3c52b1/attachment-0001.skr>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20200326/1d3c52b1/attachment-0001.asc>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list