[rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

Joe Touch touch at strayalpha.com
Wed Mar 25 16:07:56 PDT 2020

> On Mar 25, 2020, at 4:01 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot at mnot.net> wrote:
> STD and friends seem to have failed. A tentative suggestion -- still publish RFC *numbers* for archival documents, but publish RFC *names* -- e.g., RFC-HTTP -- for consolidated documents that *can* be updated over time.

Agreed, but that’s why we have roadmap and architecture of X docs. It’s never as simple as just a set. 


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list