[rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag comments

Joe Touch touch at strayalpha.com
Wed Mar 25 15:59:20 PDT 2020

> On Mar 25, 2020, at 3:24 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte at cs.fau.de> wrote:
> I "feel" that it would be better not to try to solve our issues
> nly with as few as possible tags, but also ponder what a good
> amendment/extensions text in an RFC should look like.

IMO the latter is better guidance. We need less process, not more. ESP given we have no compliance requirements. Tags are not a solution. 


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list