[rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools

John R Levine johnl at taugh.com
Thu Jul 16 11:35:31 PDT 2020


> I would recommend to start updating the URL on https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/
> from RFC7991 to whatever would be the best place to look for the current
> supported grammar. This is the place where i think everbody will go looking
> for what grammar there is, and "contact" is not in RFC7991.

The only place the actual grammar appears is in xml2rfc and the copy at 
the website below.  Julian and I are slowly updating RFC 7991 at
https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis

R's,
John

> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 08:03:00PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 16.07.2020 18:16, John R Levine wrote:
>>> In article <20200716013048.GB35840 at faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
>>> you write:
>>>>
>>>> Nice. Who'd know v3 had undocumented features ;-))
>>>
>>> Way too many.  The actual grammar used in published RFCs is here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/rfc-format/v3grammar
>>>
>>> There are five versions, each intended to be backward compatible with
>>> the previous ones.
>>> ...
>>
>> Well, we could (a) publish the updated RFC7991bis draft, and (b) try to
>> get more people involved into revising it.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list