[rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools

Toerless Eckert tte at cs.fau.de
Thu Jul 16 11:21:54 PDT 2020


I would recommend to start updating the URL on https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/
from RFC7991 to whatever would be the best place to look for the current
supported grammar. This is the place where i think everbody will go looking
for what grammar there is, and "contact" is not in RFC7991.

Cheers
    Toerless

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 08:03:00PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 16.07.2020 18:16, John R Levine wrote:
> > In article <20200716013048.GB35840 at faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
> > you write:
> > > 
> > > Nice. Who'd know v3 had undocumented features ;-))
> > 
> > Way too many.  The actual grammar used in published RFCs is here:
> > 
> > https://github.com/rfc-format/v3grammar
> > 
> > There are five versions, each intended to be backward compatible with
> > the previous ones.
> > ...
> 
> Well, we could (a) publish the updated RFC7991bis draft, and (b) try to
> get more people involved into revising it.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

-- 
---
tte at cs.fau.de


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list