[rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Jul 16 11:03:00 PDT 2020
On 16.07.2020 18:16, John R Levine wrote:
> In article <20200716013048.GB35840 at faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
> you write:
>> Nice. Who'd know v3 had undocumented features ;-))
> Way too many. The actual grammar used in published RFCs is here:
> There are five versions, each intended to be backward compatible with
> the previous ones.
Well, we could (a) publish the updated RFC7991bis draft, and (b) try to
get more people involved into revising it.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest