[rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools

John R Levine johnl at taugh.com
Thu Jul 16 09:16:59 PDT 2020

In article <20200716013048.GB35840 at faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> you write:
>Nice. Who'd know v3 had undocumented features ;-))

Way too many.  The actual grammar used in published RFCs is here:


There are five versions, each intended to be backward compatible with
the previous ones.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list