[rfc-i] The problem is SVG-Tiny

Michael Richardson mcr at sandelman.ca
Wed Jan 22 09:11:24 PST 2020


Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
    >> I think that it is reasonable to re-open the conversation.
    >> I again, am concerned about changing too many things while we adapt to
    >> xml-v3, but I think we should figure stuff out in the I-D series.

    > Yes, we absolutely need to focus on the current mess. We don't have a
    > "V3" right now. We have something that has an implementation but no spec
    > and a myriad of unprocessed tickets (not to mention the email feedback).

So, we have running code, we need to get to rough consensus, and this isn't going
to happen until we have people stability.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20200122/46dc1c58/attachment.asc>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list