[rfc-i] The problem is SVG-Tiny
mcr+ietf at sandelman.ca
Tue Jan 21 19:30:57 PST 2020
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill at hallambaker.com> wrote:
> Looking at the responses, it appears that several things are being
> 1) The restriction prohibiting color in the diagrams.
> 2) The restrictions on the use of fonts.
> 3) The restriction to a subset of SVG-Tiny.
> It is the last that requires a massive amount of time and effort to support.
Interesting, I was unaware of this conflation.
I agree with your take that SVG-Tiny is the wrong profile.
> In 2014, when the decision was taken to use 'a profile' of SVG, it was
> stated that the decision could be re-opened later. Well that is exactly
> what I am doing now.
I think that it is reasonable to re-open the conversation.
I again, am concerned about changing too many things while we adapt to
xml-v3, but I think we should figure stuff out in the I-D series.
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] mcr at sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the rfc-interest