[rfc-i] Feedback solicited: Update tags draft
ekr at rtfm.com
Sat Feb 29 06:18:57 PST 2020
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 6:12 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo at tzi.org> wrote:
> On 2020-02-29, at 14:50, Eric Rescorla <ekr at rtfm.com> wrote:
> > However, what would you say in the latter case? Older implementations
> > continue to be conformant with RFC X, but just not with RFC Y,
> We would need boilerplate in each RFC that includes potential future
I don't understand how that would work, and it's hard to see how you could
reason about it.
> Grüße, Carsten
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rfc-interest