[rfc-i] Feedback solicited: Update tags draft

Eric Rescorla ekr at rtfm.com
Sat Feb 29 06:18:57 PST 2020

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 6:12 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo at tzi.org> wrote:

> On 2020-02-29, at 14:50, Eric Rescorla <ekr at rtfm.com> wrote:
> >
> > However, what would you say in the latter case?  Older implementations
> > continue to be conformant with RFC X, but just not with RFC Y,
> We would need boilerplate in each RFC that includes potential future
> amendments.

I don't understand how that would work, and it's hard to see how you could
reason about it.


> Grüße, Carsten
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20200229/0fe4de19/attachment.html>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list