[rfc-i] Feedback solicited: Update tags draft

Stephen Farrell stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Thu Feb 27 18:12:39 PST 2020


Hi Paul,

On 27/02/2020 20:44, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> 
> I don't understand your logic here.

Robert said it better (unsurprisingly - he tends to
do that;-)...

On 27/02/2020 21:30, Robert Sparks wrote:
> 
> I disagree that you can conclude that decision without some actual 
> runtime experience.
ISTM that fixing this fuzzy thing likely requires yet
more fuzziness, at least for a while, or else the
fuzzy-fix is relatively likely to fail.

Cheers,
S.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 10715 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20200228/a3f59522/attachment-0001.skr>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20200228/a3f59522/attachment-0001.asc>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list