[rfc-i] [Rsoc] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IAB

John R. Levine johnl at iecc.com
Thu Feb 13 11:31:00 PST 2020

> comparing the new result against the original result. If they're the same,
> then no updates are needed. If they do differ, then the archived XML should
> be corrected.

There are definitely changes to the XML grammar, and I agree that if the 
XML is supposed to be archival, we should make the XML agree with the 
final spec.

This won't change the text and I don't think it's likely to change the 
appearance significantly, e.g., the page breaks in some output formats 
might change, but they're not normative.

John Levine, johnl at taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list