[rfc-i] RSOC name

Jim Schaad ietf at augustcellars.com
Sun Aug 18 18:02:34 PDT 2019

I am afraid I do not remember who was on the original search committee any
more, but if I understand correctly the following statements are true:

1.  Joel would be the only person who was on the original search committee
and the RSOC at the time of the last bidding process.
2.  There are now three people who are on the committee at the time of the
last bidding process who are still on RSOC and that does not include Joel.

Given that part of the question that was raised on the list was the issue of
how many people were bidding, am I correct in assuming that Joel was
consulted to get some answers to that question at some point given that he
is the only person to have gone through this process twice?

-----Original Message-----
From: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org> On Behalf Of Sarah
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 3:31 PM
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf at elandsys.com>
Cc: rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] RSOC name

	I believe there was access to institutional memory, in that we had
Joel on the RSOC the last time we went through this process. Remember, the
last time we went through the process, we already had an incumbent. If you
have further questions regarding RSOC membership, I encourage you to explore
those with the IAB, who appoints the RSOC.


> On Aug 18, 2019, at 12:10 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf at elandsys.com> wrote:
> Dear Sarah,
> At 10:30 AM 18-08-2019, Sarah Banks wrote:
>>        Unfortunately, that's a very broad request. If you can help me
understand what you're trying to understand and narrow the focus, that would
be helpful.
> I was trying to understand whether the institutional memory was preserved
and, if that was the case, to access some of it.  I explained that a few
times but my request did not get through probably because of communication
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy 

rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list