[rfc-i] Drafting issue... use of MAY

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Tue May 1 08:04:51 PDT 2018

On 2018-05-01 16:56, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 1 May 2018, at 7:17, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> Quite often in a spec, I find myself writing something like this:
>> A Frame MAY be either buffered or unbuffered...
>> Frames are either buffered or unbuffered...
>> Which is correct? I am thinking the second because it is not actually
>> normative, it is by definition which is not the same thing.
> The latter seems better to me for the exact reason you give.


Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list