[rfc-i] Reminder: RFC++ BoF
mellon at fugue.com
Mon Jul 16 18:55:29 PDT 2018
The trick is that the answer is easy. It's the question that's hard.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Martin J. Dürst <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
> On 2018/07/17 07:04, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> Just rest assured that the answer to the great question of life, the RFCs,
>> and everything, is 42.
> We're already done then, aren't we: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc42.
> Regards, Martin.
> P.S.: Sorry, I just couldn't resist.
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
>> Note: After reading the agenda, all referenced drafts (0) and the
>>> meeting slides, I still have no idea what problem the BOF has been
>>> scheduled to solve.
>>> I know it's "the RFC problem", but don't know what this problem consists
>>> That's not a good state to be in.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rfc-interest