[rfc-i] Reminder: RFC++ BoF

Ted Lemon mellon at fugue.com
Mon Jul 16 18:55:29 PDT 2018


The trick is that the answer is easy.   It's the question that's hard.

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Martin J. Dürst <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
wrote:

> On 2018/07/17 07:04, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
>> Just rest assured that the answer to the great question of life, the RFCs,
>> and everything, is 42.
>>
>
> We're already done then, aren't we: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc42.
>
> Regards,   Martin.
>
> P.S.: Sorry, I just couldn't resist.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Note: After reading the agenda, all referenced drafts (0) and the
>>> meeting slides, I still have no idea what problem the BOF has been
>>> scheduled to solve.
>>>
>>> I know it's "the RFC problem", but don't know what this problem consists
>>> of.
>>>
>>> That's not a good state to be in.
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20180716/555756fe/attachment.html>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list