[rfc-i] Reminder: RFC++ BoF

Martin J. Dürst duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Mon Jul 16 18:53:13 PDT 2018

On 2018/07/17 07:04, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Just rest assured that the answer to the great question of life, the RFCs,
> and everything, is 42.

We're already done then, aren't we: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc42.

Regards,   Martin.

P.S.: Sorry, I just couldn't resist.

> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
> wrote:
>> Note: After reading the agenda, all referenced drafts (0) and the
>> meeting slides, I still have no idea what problem the BOF has been
>> scheduled to solve.
>> I know it's "the RFC problem", but don't know what this problem consists
>> of.
>> That's not a good state to be in.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list